public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
	UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Arun.Ramadoss@microchip.com,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 02/23] net: phy: add genphy_c45_read_eee_abilities() function
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 02:54:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230204005418.7ryb4ihuzxlbs2nl@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230201145845.2312060-3-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>

On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 03:58:24PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Add generic function for EEE abilities defined by IEEE 802.3
> specification. For now following registers are supported:
> - IEEE 802.3-2018 45.2.3.10 EEE control and capability 1 (Register 3.20)
> - IEEE 802.3cg-2019 45.2.1.186b 10BASE-T1L PMA status register
>   (Register 1.2295)
> 
> Since I was not able to find any flag signaling support of this

these registers

> registers, we should detect link mode abilities first and then based on
> this abilities doing EEE link modes detection.

these abilities

> 
> Results of EEE ability detection will be stored in to new variable

stored into

> phydev->supported_eee.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  drivers/net/phy/phy-c45.c    | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 16 ++++++++++++
>  include/linux/mdio.h         | 17 +++++++++++++
>  include/linux/phy.h          |  5 ++++
>  4 files changed, 87 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy-c45.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy-c45.c
> index 9f9565a4819d..ae87f5856650 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy-c45.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy-c45.c
> @@ -661,6 +661,55 @@ int genphy_c45_read_mdix(struct phy_device *phydev)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(genphy_c45_read_mdix);
>  
> +/**
> + * genphy_c45_read_eee_abilities - read supported EEE link modes
> + * @phydev: target phy_device struct
> + *
> + * Read supported EEE link modes.
> + */
> +int genphy_c45_read_eee_abilities(struct phy_device *phydev)
> +{
> +	__ETHTOOL_DECLARE_LINK_MODE_MASK(common);
> +	int val;
> +
> +	linkmode_and(common, phydev->supported, PHY_EEE_100_10000_FEATURES);
> +	/* There is not indicator if optional register

no indicator whether

> +	 * "EEE control and capability 1" (3.20) is supported. Read it only
> +	 * on devices with appropriate linkmodes.
> +	 */
> +	if (!linkmode_empty(common)) {

if (linkmode_intersects(phydev->supported, PHY_EEE_100_10000_FEATURES))?

> +		/* IEEE 802.3-2018 45.2.3.10 EEE control and capability 1
> +		 * (Register 3.20)
> +		 */
> +		val = phy_read_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_PCS, MDIO_PCS_EEE_ABLE);
> +		if (val < 0)
> +			return val;

Might the PHY also return 0xffff for an unsupported register? That would
be interpreted as "EEE is supported for all link modes", no?

> +
> +		mii_eee_100_10000_adv_mod_linkmode_t(phydev->supported_eee, val);
> +
> +		/* Some buggy devices claim not supported EEE link modes */

unsupported

> +		linkmode_and(phydev->supported_eee, phydev->supported_eee,
> +			     phydev->supported);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (linkmode_test_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_10baseT1L_Full_BIT,
> +			      phydev->supported)) {
> +		/* IEEE 802.3cg-2019 45.2.1.186b 10BASE-T1L PMA status register
> +		 * (Register 1.2295)
> +		 */
> +		val = phy_read_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_PMAPMD, MDIO_PMA_10T1L_STAT);
> +		if (val < 0)
> +			return val;
> +
> +		linkmode_mod_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_10baseT1L_Full_BIT,
> +				 phydev->supported_eee,
> +				 val & MDIO_PMA_10T1L_STAT_EEE);
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(genphy_c45_read_eee_abilities);
> +
>  /**
>   * genphy_c45_pma_read_abilities - read supported link modes from PMA
>   * @phydev: target phy_device struct
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> index 9ba8f973f26f..3651f1fd8fc9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> @@ -132,6 +132,18 @@ static const int phy_10gbit_full_features_array[] = {
>  	ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_10000baseT_Full_BIT,
>  };
>  
> +static const int phy_eee_100_10000_features_array[6] = {

Don't need array length unless the array is sparse, which isn't the case here.

> +	ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_100baseT_Full_BIT,
> +	ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_1000baseT_Full_BIT,
> +	ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_10000baseT_Full_BIT,
> +	ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_1000baseKX_Full_BIT,
> +	ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_10000baseKX4_Full_BIT,
> +	ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_10000baseKR_Full_BIT,

Why stop at 10GBase-KR? Register 3.20 defines EEE abilities up to 100G
(for speeds >10G, there seem to be 2 modes, "deep sleep" or "fast wake",
with "deep sleep" being essentially equivalent to the only mode
available for <=10G modes).

> +};
> +
> +__ETHTOOL_DECLARE_LINK_MODE_MASK(phy_eee_100_10000_features) __ro_after_init;
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(phy_eee_100_10000_features);
> +
>  static void features_init(void)
>  {
>  	/* 10/100 half/full*/
> @@ -213,6 +225,10 @@ static void features_init(void)
>  	linkmode_set_bit_array(phy_10gbit_fec_features_array,
>  			       ARRAY_SIZE(phy_10gbit_fec_features_array),
>  			       phy_10gbit_fec_features);
> +	linkmode_set_bit_array(phy_eee_100_10000_features_array,
> +			       ARRAY_SIZE(phy_eee_100_10000_features_array),
> +			       phy_eee_100_10000_features);
> +
>  }
>  
>  void phy_device_free(struct phy_device *phydev)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-02-04  0:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-01 14:58 [PATCH net-next v4 00/23] net: add EEE support for KSZ9477 and AR8035 with i.MX6 Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 01/23] net: dsa: microchip: enable EEE support Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-04  0:14   ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 02/23] net: phy: add genphy_c45_read_eee_abilities() function Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 17:12   ` Andrew Lunn
2023-02-04  0:54   ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2023-02-06 10:49     ` Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-06 11:22       ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-06 15:42         ` Andrew Lunn
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 03/23] net: phy: micrel: add ksz9477_get_features() Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 04/23] net: phy: export phy_check_valid() function Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 17:15   ` Andrew Lunn
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 05/23] net: phy: add genphy_c45_ethtool_get/set_eee() support Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 17:20   ` Andrew Lunn
2023-02-01 20:18   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-02-04  1:11   ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 06/23] net: phy: c22: migrate to genphy_c45_write_eee_adv() Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 17:28   ` Andrew Lunn
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 07/23] net: phy: c45: " Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 08/23] net: phy: migrate phy_init_eee() to genphy_c45_eee_is_active() Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 16:41   ` Andrew Lunn
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 09/23] net: phy: start using genphy_c45_ethtool_get/set_eee() Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 10/23] net: phy: add driver specific get/set_eee support Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 11/23] net: phy: at803x: implement ethtool access to SmartEEE functionality Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 12/23] net: phy: at803x: ar8035: fix EEE support for half duplex links Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 13/23] net: phy: add PHY specifica flag to signal SmartEEE support Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 14/23] net: phy: at803x: add PHY_SMART_EEE flag to AR8035 Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 15/23] net: phy: add phy_has_smarteee() helper Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 16/23] net: fec: add support for PHYs with SmartEEE support Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 17/23] e1000e: replace EEE ethtool helpers to linkmode variants Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 18/23] igb: " Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 19/23] igc: " Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 20/23] tg3: " Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 21/23] r8152: " Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 22/23] net: usb: ax88179_178a: " Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 23/23] net: mdio: drop EEE ethtool helpers in favor " Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-04  0:13 ` [PATCH net-next v4 00/23] net: add EEE support for KSZ9477 and AR8035 with i.MX6 Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-06  5:47   ` Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-06 14:10     ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-06 15:39       ` Andrew Lunn
2023-02-06 18:37         ` Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-06 20:21           ` Andrew Lunn
2023-02-06 18:25       ` Oleksij Rempel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230204005418.7ryb4ihuzxlbs2nl@skbuf \
    --to=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=Arun.Ramadoss@microchip.com \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
    --cc=wei.fang@nxp.com \
    --cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox