From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Jeroen de Borst <jeroendb@google.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4] gve: Introduce a way to disable queue formats
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 22:50:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230206225018.50d62d62@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230204192940.2782312-1-jeroendb@google.com>
On Sat, 4 Feb 2023 11:29:40 -0800 Jeroen de Borst wrote:
> The device is capable of simultaneously supporting multiple
> queue formats. These queue formats are:
>
> - GQI-QPL: A queue format with in-order completions and a
> bounce-buffer (Queue Page List)
> - GQI-RDA: A queue format with in-order completions and no
> bounce-buffer (Raw DMA Access)
> - DQO-RDA: A queue format with out-of-order completions and
> no bounce buffer
Thanks but..
> With this change the driver can deliberately pick a queue format.
Driver can already do whatever it wants. Now the _user_ can pick
the format. But the user still has no understanding of what the
practical impact of picking one queue format over another will be.
Do you have a reason to believe that the description above (and in
docs) will be sufficient for user to make a decision?
I tried to search the web but got no hits to any GCP docs either.
Differently put what is you motivation to give this control to the user?
> +
> +struct bpf_prog;
> static int gve_verify_driver_compatibility(struct gve_priv *priv)
Adding the forward declaration for bpf_prog looks like a stray change.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-07 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-04 19:29 [PATCH net-next v4] gve: Introduce a way to disable queue formats Jeroen de Borst
2023-02-07 6:50 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230206225018.50d62d62@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jeroendb@google.com \
--cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).