Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>, "Felix Fietkau" <nbd@nbd.name>,
	"John Crispin" <john@phrozen.org>,
	"Sean Wang" <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
	"Mark Lee" <Mark-MC.Lee@mediatek.com>,
	"Lorenzo Bianconi" <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
	"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"AngeloGioacchino Del Regno"
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	"Arınç ÜNAL" <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: fix DSA TX tag hwaccel for switch port 0
Date: Tue,  7 Feb 2023 12:30:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230207103027.1203344-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> (raw)

Arınç reports that on his MT7621AT Unielec U7621-06 board and MT7623NI
Bananapi BPI-R2, packets received by the CPU over mt7530 switch port 0
(of which this driver acts as the DSA master) are not processed
correctly by software. More precisely, they arrive without a DSA tag
(in packet or in the hwaccel area - skb_metadata_dst()), so DSA cannot
demux them towards the switch's interface for port 0. Traffic from other
ports receives a skb_metadata_dst() with the correct port and is demuxed
properly.

Looking at mtk_poll_rx(), it becomes apparent that this driver uses the
skb vlan hwaccel area:

	union {
		u32		vlan_all;
		struct {
			__be16	vlan_proto;
			__u16	vlan_tci;
		};
	};

as a temporary storage for the VLAN hwaccel tag, or the DSA hwaccel tag.
If this is a DSA master it's a DSA hwaccel tag, and finally clears up
the skb VLAN hwaccel header.

I'm guessing that the problem is the (mis)use of API.
skb_vlan_tag_present() looks like this:

 #define skb_vlan_tag_present(__skb)	(!!(__skb)->vlan_all)

So if both vlan_proto and vlan_tci are zeroes, skb_vlan_tag_present()
returns precisely false. I don't know for sure what is the format of the
DSA hwaccel tag, but I surely know that lowermost 3 bits of vlan_proto
are 0 when receiving from port 0:

	unsigned int port = vlan_proto & GENMASK(2, 0);

If the RX descriptor has no other bits set to non-zero values in
RX_DMA_VTAG, then the call to __vlan_hwaccel_put_tag() will not, in
fact, make the subsequent skb_vlan_tag_present() return true, because
it's implemented like this:

static inline void __vlan_hwaccel_put_tag(struct sk_buff *skb,
					  __be16 vlan_proto, u16 vlan_tci)
{
	skb->vlan_proto = vlan_proto;
	skb->vlan_tci = vlan_tci;
}

What we need to do to fix this problem (assuming this is the problem) is
to stop using skb->vlan_all as temporary storage for driver affairs, and
just create some local variables that serve the same purpose, but
hopefully better. Instead of calling skb_vlan_tag_present(), let's look
at a boolean has_hwaccel_tag which we set to true when the RX DMA
descriptors have something. Disambiguate based on netdev_uses_dsa()
whether this is a VLAN or DSA hwaccel tag, and only call
__vlan_hwaccel_put_tag() if we're certain it's a VLAN tag.

Arınç confirms that the treatment works, so this validates the
assumption.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/704f3a72-fc9e-714a-db54-272e17612637@arinc9.com/
Fixes: 2d7605a72906 ("net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: enable hardware DSA untagging")
Reported-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
Tested-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c | 24 ++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
index f1cb1efc94cf..64b575fbe317 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
@@ -1921,7 +1921,9 @@ static int mtk_poll_rx(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget,
 
 	while (done < budget) {
 		unsigned int pktlen, *rxdcsum;
+		bool has_hwaccel_tag = false;
 		struct net_device *netdev;
+		u16 vlan_proto, vlan_tci;
 		dma_addr_t dma_addr;
 		u32 hash, reason;
 		int mac = 0;
@@ -2061,27 +2063,29 @@ static int mtk_poll_rx(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget,
 
 		if (netdev->features & NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_RX) {
 			if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_NETSYS_V2)) {
-				if (trxd.rxd3 & RX_DMA_VTAG_V2)
-					__vlan_hwaccel_put_tag(skb,
-						htons(RX_DMA_VPID(trxd.rxd4)),
-						RX_DMA_VID(trxd.rxd4));
+				if (trxd.rxd3 & RX_DMA_VTAG_V2) {
+					vlan_proto = RX_DMA_VPID(trxd.rxd4);
+					vlan_tci = RX_DMA_VID(trxd.rxd4);
+					has_hwaccel_tag = true;
+				}
 			} else if (trxd.rxd2 & RX_DMA_VTAG) {
-				__vlan_hwaccel_put_tag(skb, htons(RX_DMA_VPID(trxd.rxd3)),
-						       RX_DMA_VID(trxd.rxd3));
+				vlan_proto = RX_DMA_VPID(trxd.rxd3);
+				vlan_tci = RX_DMA_VID(trxd.rxd3);
+				has_hwaccel_tag = true;
 			}
 		}
 
 		/* When using VLAN untagging in combination with DSA, the
 		 * hardware treats the MTK special tag as a VLAN and untags it.
 		 */
-		if (skb_vlan_tag_present(skb) && netdev_uses_dsa(netdev)) {
-			unsigned int port = ntohs(skb->vlan_proto) & GENMASK(2, 0);
+		if (has_hwaccel_tag && netdev_uses_dsa(netdev)) {
+			unsigned int port = vlan_proto & GENMASK(2, 0);
 
 			if (port < ARRAY_SIZE(eth->dsa_meta) &&
 			    eth->dsa_meta[port])
 				skb_dst_set_noref(skb, &eth->dsa_meta[port]->dst);
-
-			__vlan_hwaccel_clear_tag(skb);
+		} else if (has_hwaccel_tag) {
+			__vlan_hwaccel_put_tag(skb, htons(vlan_proto), vlan_tci);
 		}
 
 		skb_record_rx_queue(skb, 0);
-- 
2.34.1


             reply	other threads:[~2023-02-07 10:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-07 10:30 Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2023-02-07 10:42 ` [PATCH net] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: fix DSA TX tag hwaccel for switch port 0 Felix Fietkau
2023-02-08  9:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230207103027.1203344-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    --to=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    --cc=Mark-MC.Lee@mediatek.com \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=arinc.unal@arinc9.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=john@phrozen.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=nbd@nbd.name \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox