[net-next 04/15] net/mlx5e: Don't listen to remove flows event

[Saeed Mahameed <saeed@kernel.org>]

From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>

remove_flow_enable event isn't really needed as it will be
triggered once user and/or XFRM core explicitly asked to delete
state. In such situation, we won't be interested in any event
at all.

So don't trigger and listen to remove_flow_enable event.

Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
---
 .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_offload.c  | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_offload.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_offload.c
index 57ac0f663fcd..7fb3835befbd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_offload.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_offload.c
@@ -92,7 +92,6 @@ static void mlx5e_ipsec_packet_setup(void *obj, u32 pdn,
 		MLX5_SET(ipsec_aso, aso_ctx, remove_flow_pkt_cnt,
 			 lower_32_bits(attrs->hard_packet_limit));
 		MLX5_SET(ipsec_aso, aso_ctx, hard_lft_arm, 1);
-		MLX5_SET(ipsec_aso, aso_ctx, remove_flow_enable, 1);
 	}
 
 	if (attrs->soft_packet_limit != XFRM_INF) {
@@ -329,8 +328,7 @@ static void mlx5e_ipsec_handle_event(struct work_struct *_work)
 
 	if (attrs->soft_packet_limit != XFRM_INF)
 		if (!MLX5_GET(ipsec_aso, aso->ctx, soft_lft_arm) ||
-		    !MLX5_GET(ipsec_aso, aso->ctx, hard_lft_arm) ||
-		    !MLX5_GET(ipsec_aso, aso->ctx, remove_flow_enable))
+		    !MLX5_GET(ipsec_aso, aso->ctx, hard_lft_arm))
 			xfrm_state_check_expire(sa_entry->x);
 
 unlock:
-- 
2.39.1