[PATCH net-next 1/4] rxrpc: Use consume_skb() rather than kfree_skb_reason()

[David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>]

Use consume_skb() rather than kfree_skb_reason().

Reported-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
---
 net/rxrpc/skbuff.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/rxrpc/skbuff.c b/net/rxrpc/skbuff.c
index 944320e65ea8..3bcd6ee80396 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/skbuff.c
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ void rxrpc_free_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, enum rxrpc_skb_trace why)
 	if (skb) {
 		int n = atomic_dec_return(select_skb_count(skb));
 		trace_rxrpc_skb(skb, refcount_read(&skb->users), n, why);
-		kfree_skb_reason(skb, SKB_CONSUMED);
+		consume_skb(skb);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -78,6 +78,6 @@ void rxrpc_purge_queue(struct sk_buff_head *list)
 		int n = atomic_dec_return(select_skb_count(skb));
 		trace_rxrpc_skb(skb, refcount_read(&skb->users), n,
 				rxrpc_skb_put_purge);
-		kfree_skb_reason(skb, SKB_CONSUMED);
+		consume_skb(skb);
 	}
 }