From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
"open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"hare@suse.com" <hare@suse.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>,
Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com>,
"jmeneghi@redhat.com" <jmeneghi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] net/handshake: Create a NETLINK service for handling handshake requests
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 10:09:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230210100915.3fde31dd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EB241BE0-8829-4719-99EC-2C3E74384FA9@oracle.com>
On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 14:17:28 +0000 Chuck Lever III wrote:
> >> I don't think it does, necessarily. But neither does it seem
> >> to add any value (for this use case). <shrug>
> >
> > Our default is to go for generic netlink, it's where we invest most time
> > in terms of infrastructure.
>
> v2 of the series used generic netlink for the downcall piece.
> I can convert back to using generic netlink for v4 of the
> series.
Would you be able to write the spec for it? I'm happy to help with that
as I mentioned. Perhaps you have the user space already hand-written
here but in case the mechanism/family gets reused it'd be sad if people
had to hand write bindings for other programming languages.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-10 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-07 21:41 [PATCH v3 0/2] Another crack at a handshake upcall mechanism Chuck Lever
2023-02-07 21:41 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] net/handshake: Create a NETLINK service for handling handshake requests Chuck Lever
2023-02-08 16:20 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-02-09 6:00 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-02-09 15:43 ` Chuck Lever III
2023-02-09 16:02 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-02-09 16:34 ` Chuck Lever III
2023-02-10 11:41 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-02-10 14:31 ` Chuck Lever III
2023-02-10 15:06 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-02-10 15:21 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-02-10 15:38 ` Chuck Lever III
2023-02-12 15:40 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2023-02-12 17:24 ` Chuck Lever III
2023-02-10 2:07 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-02-10 14:17 ` Chuck Lever III
2023-02-10 18:09 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-02-10 19:04 ` Chuck Lever III
2023-02-10 21:44 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-02-11 20:55 ` Chuck Lever III
2023-02-13 21:40 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-02-11 12:11 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-02-13 21:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-02-07 21:41 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] net/tls: Support AF_HANDSHAKE in kTLS Chuck Lever
2023-02-08 16:34 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-02-08 17:04 ` Chuck Lever III
2023-02-08 17:48 ` Marcel Holtmann
2023-02-14 9:44 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Another crack at a handshake upcall mechanism Hannes Reinecke
2023-02-14 11:09 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230210100915.3fde31dd@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=bcodding@redhat.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=jmeneghi@redhat.com \
--cc=kolga@netapp.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).