From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 502C8C636D4 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 01:36:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229863AbjBNBgT (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2023 20:36:19 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46100 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229570AbjBNBgS (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2023 20:36:18 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96F024238 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 17:36:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B591B61370 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 01:36:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B4A20C433D2; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 01:36:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1676338575; bh=FFy3lBM5uwSNctUSfNnw4D9KRyYy9ynrHfsioBN+Vbg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=t+rzlY+kCjtd4mn1aybZotX4qyDWKo653us8eXPu5k3nlUVZlesuC8t294fxkZLdG zODm2RgQ4om91rrYXRRrqQombri4duB3UzPwFUIvV6F0M/4qJxDD9AZr1PzJSdfJr3 Cj+P3AjKP/24HkhRz1ZxBrXYYILQa//7P+1gkDpr4iRIASDAsgDI2YDfi6GT6PPHI1 kQ2HA2dVUAHc2DPDUe4xhIEfF5OgHf8ohlnwX+sKjGGz4ngFvvgE9UajAmPl2Z5ppo 3zWkyBDogBzTrB4JtV3dNBI1DUelhs0cunGwrAjGyBwxoNkcuc1ChSieCKxfO1Rx23 pYlUDzYmg5yAQ== Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 17:36:13 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Uwe =?UTF-8?B?S2xlaW5lLUvDtm5pZw==?= Cc: Larysa Zaremba , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Torgue , Jose Abreu , kernel@pengutronix.de, Giuseppe Cavallaro , linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: stmmac: Make stmmac_dvr_remove() return void Message-ID: <20230213173613.67512a1e@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20230213162333.iqjlwa2ladkxfooy@pengutronix.de> References: <20230211112431.214252-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <20230213162333.iqjlwa2ladkxfooy@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 17:23:33 +0100 Uwe Kleine-K=C3=B6nig wrote: > > Code in both patches looks OK. =20 >=20 > Is this an Ack? FWIW we encourage folks on netdev who reviewed a patch to speak up, even if they don't feel confident enough to send a persistent tag. > > Also, multiple patches usually require a cover letter. The code changes= are=20 > > trivial, so maybe the best solution would be to just to squash those pa= tches=20 > > together. =20 >=20 > My conclusion was a bit different: The code changes are trivial, so they > don't require a cover letter :-) >=20 > I don't care much about squashing the two patches together. I slightly > prefer to keep the changes as two changes as the changes are orthogonal > and one patch per thing is the usual action. Fair enough, 2 patches are fine w/o a cover letter.