From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A49E7C64EC7 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 16:35:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229733AbjB1QfI (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2023 11:35:08 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55702 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229727AbjB1QfH (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2023 11:35:07 -0500 Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc (Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:237:300::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42C5930B19 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 08:35:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from fw by Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pX2wH-0004Ee-TO; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 17:34:53 +0100 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 17:34:53 +0100 From: Florian Westphal To: Alexander Lobakin Cc: Jakub Kicinski , Florian Westphal , edumazet@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com, shakeelb@google.com, soheil@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: avoid indirect memory pressure calls Message-ID: <20230228163453.GA11370@breakpoint.cc> References: <20230224184606.7101-1-fw@strlen.de> <20230227152741.4a53634b@kernel.org> <0650079e-2cc1-626b-ac04-2230b41fd842@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0650079e-2cc1-626b-ac04-2230b41fd842@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Alexander Lobakin wrote: > From: Jakub Kicinski > Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 15:27:41 -0800 > > > On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 19:46:06 +0100 Florian Westphal wrote: > >> There is a noticeable tcp performance regression (loopback or cross-netns), > >> seen with iperf3 -Z (sendfile mode) when generic retpolines are needed. > >> > >> With SK_RECLAIM_THRESHOLD checks gone number of calls to enter/leave > >> memory pressure happen much more often. For TCP indirect calls are > >> used. > >> > >> We can't remove the if-set-return short-circuit check in > >> tcp_enter_memory_pressure because there are callers other than > >> sk_enter_memory_pressure. Doing a check in the sk wrapper too > >> reduces the indirect calls enough to recover some performance. > >> > >> Before, > >> 0.00-60.00 sec 322 GBytes 46.1 Gbits/sec receiver > >> > >> After: > >> 0.00-60.04 sec 359 GBytes 51.4 Gbits/sec receiver > >> > >> "iperf3 -c $peer -t 60 -Z -f g", connected via veth in another netns. > >> > >> Fixes: 4890b686f408 ("net: keep sk->sk_forward_alloc as small as possible") > >> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal > > > > Looks acceptable, Eric? > > > I'm no Eric, but I'd only change this: > > + if (!memory_pressure || READ_ONCE(*memory_pressure) == 0) > > to > > + if (!memory_pressure || !READ_ONCE(*memory_pressure)) I intentioanlly used '== 0', i found it too easy to miss the '!' before 'R'. But maybe I just need better glasses.