From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Madhu Koriginja <madhu.koriginja@nxp.com>
Cc: gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk, davem@davemloft.net, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru,
yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, edumazet@google.com,
dccp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vani.namala@nxp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [net:netfilter]: Keep conntrack reference until IPsecv6 policy checks are done
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 12:35:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230302113523.GD23204@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230302112324.906365-1-madhu.koriginja@nxp.com>
Madhu Koriginja <madhu.koriginja@nxp.com> wrote:
> Keep the conntrack reference until policy checks have been performed for
> IPsec V6 NAT support. The reference needs to be dropped before a packet is
> queued to avoid having the conntrack module unloadable.
Subject Line should be:
[PATCH net] net: netfilter: Keep conntrack reference until IPsecv6 policy checks are done
or
[PATCH net-next] net: netfilter: Keep ..
see below why net-next makes more sense to me.
> Signed-off-by: Madhu Koriginja <madhu.koriginja@nxp.com>
> V1-V2: added missing () in ip6_input.c in below condition
> if (!(ipprot->flags & INET6_PROTO_NOPOLICY))
This should appear before your signed-off-by, or
> ---
> net/dccp/ipv6.c | 1 +
... here.
I think its fine to place it here because in this case
the mini-changelog doesn't provide any additional context
worth keeping in git.
Paolo, Jakub, David: This is a bug, but its not a regression
either. I would suggest that Madhu resubmits this AFTER
net-next re-opens.
Madhu, if thats the agreed-upon procedure, you may include
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
when you resend this patch as-is.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-02 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-02 11:23 [PATCH] [net:netfilter]: Keep conntrack reference until IPsecv6 policy checks are done Madhu Koriginja
2023-03-02 11:35 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2023-03-02 14:27 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-03-03 9:53 ` [EXT] " Madhu Koriginja
2023-03-07 6:22 ` Madhu Koriginja
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-03-21 15:58 [PATCH] net : netfilter: " Madhu Koriginja
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230302113523.GD23204@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dccp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=madhu.koriginja@nxp.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vani.namala@nxp.com \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).