From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
To: willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net,
dsahern@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, kerneljasonxing@gmail.com,
Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 net-next] udp: introduce __sk_mem_schedule() usage
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 19:57:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230306115745.87401-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Keep the accounting schema consistent across different protocols
with __sk_mem_schedule(). Besides, it adjusts a little bit on how
to calculate forward allocated memory compared to before. After
applied this patch, we could avoid receive path scheduling extra
amount of memory.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230221110344.82818-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
---
V2:
1) change the title and body message
2) use __sk_mem_schedule() instead suggested by Paolo Abeni
---
net/ipv4/udp.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
index 9592fe3e444a..21c99087110d 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
@@ -1531,10 +1531,23 @@ static void busylock_release(spinlock_t *busy)
spin_unlock(busy);
}
+static inline int udp_rmem_schedule(struct sock *sk, int size)
+{
+ int delta;
+
+ delta = size - sk->sk_forward_alloc;
+ if (delta > 0 && !__sk_mem_schedule(sk, delta, SK_MEM_RECV))
+ return -ENOBUFS;
+
+ sk->sk_forward_alloc -= size;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
int __udp_enqueue_schedule_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct sk_buff_head *list = &sk->sk_receive_queue;
- int rmem, delta, amt, err = -ENOMEM;
+ int rmem, err = -ENOMEM;
spinlock_t *busy = NULL;
int size;
@@ -1567,20 +1580,12 @@ int __udp_enqueue_schedule_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
goto uncharge_drop;
spin_lock(&list->lock);
- if (size >= sk->sk_forward_alloc) {
- amt = sk_mem_pages(size);
- delta = amt << PAGE_SHIFT;
- if (!__sk_mem_raise_allocated(sk, delta, amt, SK_MEM_RECV)) {
- err = -ENOBUFS;
- spin_unlock(&list->lock);
- goto uncharge_drop;
- }
-
- sk->sk_forward_alloc += delta;
+ err = udp_rmem_schedule(sk, size);
+ if (err) {
+ spin_unlock(&list->lock);
+ goto uncharge_drop;
}
- sk->sk_forward_alloc -= size;
-
/* no need to setup a destructor, we will explicitly release the
* forward allocated memory on dequeue
*/
--
2.37.3
next reply other threads:[~2023-03-06 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-06 11:57 Jason Xing [this message]
2023-03-06 14:51 ` [PATCH v2 net-next] udp: introduce __sk_mem_schedule() usage Simon Horman
2023-03-07 0:25 ` Jason Xing
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230306115745.87401-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--to=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).