Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
Cc: Danila Chernetsov <listdansp@mail.ru>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	lvc-project@linuxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: dsa: vsc73xxx: Fix uninitalized 'val' in vsc73xx_adjust_link
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 01:04:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230313230404.vww27tkxh6xvp24h@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZA9yj1FT7eLOCU34@corigine.com>

On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 07:59:27PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 03:50:08PM +0000, Danila Chernetsov wrote:
> > Using uninitialized variable after calls vsc73xx_read 
> > without error checking may cause incorrect driver behavior.
> 
> I wonder if it is:
> a) intentional that these calls are not checked for errors

probably no; this is precisely the only vsc73xx_read() call whose return
code is ignores. I'd say it partly has to do with the fact that vsc73xx_adjust_link()
returns void, so the author was thinking there'd be no point in checking
for errors, but there clearly is

> b) errors can occur in these call paths

probably yes; one of the instantiations of vsc73xx is over SPI, where
the controller can time out, etc.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-13 23:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-12 15:50 [PATCH] net: dsa: vsc73xxx: Fix uninitalized 'val' in vsc73xx_adjust_link Danila Chernetsov
2023-03-13 18:59 ` Simon Horman
2023-03-13 22:22   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-13 23:04   ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230313230404.vww27tkxh6xvp24h@skbuf \
    --to=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=listdansp@mail.ru \
    --cc=lvc-project@linuxtesting.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=simon.horman@corigine.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox