From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com,
Arun Ramadoss <arun.ramadoss@microchip.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>,
Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH net-next 0/4] KSZ DSA driver: xMII speed adjustment and partial reg_fields conversion
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 07:02:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230317060220.GC13320@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230316161250.3286055-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Hi Vladimir,
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 06:12:46PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yesterday I picked up this patch and resubmitted it:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20230222031738.189025-1-marex@denx.de/
> here:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20230315231916.2998480-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com/
>
> and today I'm trying to address the rest of the points brought up in
> that conversation, namely:
>
> - commit c476bede4b0f ("net: dsa: microchip: ksz8795: use common xmii
> function") stopped adjusting the xMII port speed on KSZ8795, does it
> still work? No idea. Patch 3/4 deals with that.
>
> - Mapping P_XMII_CTRL_0 and P_XMII_CTRL_1 to the same value on KSZ8795
> raised some eyebrows, and some reading shows that it is also partially
> incorrect (see patch 2/4). This is also where I propose to convert to
> reg_fields.
>
> As it turns out, patch 2/4 is a dependency for patch 3/4, even if 3/4
> may be a fix.
>
> Patch 1/4 is a dependency of 2/4.
>
> Patch 4/4 is something I also noticed during review. I left it at the
> end so that it won't conflict with something that could reasonably be
> submitted as a bug fix.
>
> ABSOLUTELY NO TESTING WAS DONE. I don't have the hardware.
>
> THIS BREAKS EVERYTHING EXCEPT FOR KSZ8795. Any testers should test on
> that if possible (due to both patches 2/4, and 3/4).
I can test it on KSZ8873, but currently it is not compiling on top of net-next.
Regards,
Oleksij
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-17 6:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-16 16:12 [RFC/RFT PATCH net-next 0/4] KSZ DSA driver: xMII speed adjustment and partial reg_fields conversion Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-16 16:12 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH net-next 1/4] net: dsa: microchip: add an enum for regmap widths Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-16 16:12 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH net-next 2/4] net: dsa: microchip: partial conversion to regfields API for KSZ8795 (WIP) Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-17 9:46 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-17 11:46 ` Oleksij Rempel
2023-03-17 12:50 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-17 13:21 ` Oleksij Rempel
2023-03-17 14:07 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-25 12:16 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-25 14:26 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-03-16 16:12 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH net-next 3/4] net: dsa: microchip: allow setting xMII port speed/duplex on KSZ8765/KSZ8794/KSZ8795 Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-16 16:12 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH net-next 4/4] net: dsa: microchip: remove unused dev->dev_ops->phylink_mac_config() Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-17 3:57 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH net-next 0/4] KSZ DSA driver: xMII speed adjustment and partial reg_fields conversion Arun.Ramadoss
2023-03-17 6:02 ` Oleksij Rempel [this message]
2023-03-17 9:43 ` Vladimir Oltean
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230317060220.GC13320@pengutronix.de \
--to=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=arun.ramadoss@microchip.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linux@rempel-privat.de \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
--cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).