From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@kernel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 01/14] lib: cpu_rmap: Avoid use after free on rmap->obj array entries
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 20:38:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230321203836.5ab4951e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230320175144.153187-2-saeed@kernel.org>
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 10:51:31 -0700 Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> From: Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com>
>
> When calling irq_set_affinity_notifier() with NULL at the notify
> argument, it will cause freeing of the glue pointer in the
> corresponding array entry but will leave the pointer in the array. A
> subsequent call to free_irq_cpu_rmap() will try to free this entry again
> leading to possible use after free.
>
> Fix that by setting NULL to the array entry and checking that we have
> non-zero at the array entry when iterating over the array in
> free_irq_cpu_rmap().
Commit message needs some work. Are you trying to make double
free_irq_cpu_rmap() work fine because of callers? Are there problems
with error path of irq_cpu_rmap_add()? I can tell what you're trying
to prevent but not why.
> Fixes: c39649c331c7 ("lib: cpu_rmap: CPU affinity reverse-mapping")
What is this Fixes tag doing in a net-next patch :S
If it can be triggered it needs to go to net.
> Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
> ---
> lib/cpu_rmap.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/cpu_rmap.c b/lib/cpu_rmap.c
> index f08d9c56f712..e77f12bb3c77 100644
> --- a/lib/cpu_rmap.c
> +++ b/lib/cpu_rmap.c
> @@ -232,7 +232,8 @@ void free_irq_cpu_rmap(struct cpu_rmap *rmap)
>
> for (index = 0; index < rmap->used; index++) {
After looking at this code for 10min - isn't the problem that used
is never decremented on the error path?
I don't see a way to remove from the map so it can't be sparse.
> glue = rmap->obj[index];
> - irq_set_affinity_notifier(glue->notify.irq, NULL);
> + if (glue)
> + irq_set_affinity_notifier(glue->notify.irq, NULL);
> }
>
> cpu_rmap_put(rmap);
> @@ -268,6 +269,7 @@ static void irq_cpu_rmap_release(struct kref *ref)
> container_of(ref, struct irq_glue, notify.kref);
>
> cpu_rmap_put(glue->rmap);
> + glue->rmap->obj[glue->index] = NULL;
> kfree(glue);
> }
>
> @@ -297,6 +299,7 @@ int irq_cpu_rmap_add(struct cpu_rmap *rmap, int irq)
> rc = irq_set_affinity_notifier(irq, &glue->notify);
> if (rc) {
> cpu_rmap_put(glue->rmap);
> + rmap->obj[glue->index] = NULL;
> kfree(glue);
> }
> return rc;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-22 3:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-20 17:51 [pull request][net-next 00/14] mlx5 updates 2023-03-20 Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 01/14] lib: cpu_rmap: Avoid use after free on rmap->obj array entries Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-22 3:38 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-03-22 9:43 ` Eli Cohen
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 02/14] lib: cpu_rmap: Use allocator for rmap entries Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-22 3:40 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-22 3:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-22 10:01 ` Eli Cohen
2023-03-22 10:01 ` Eli Cohen
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 03/14] lib: cpu_rmap: Add irq_cpu_rmap_remove to complement irq_cpu_rmap_add Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-22 3:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-22 11:24 ` Eli Cohen
2023-03-22 18:45 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 04/14] net/mlx5e: Coding style fix, add empty line Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 05/14] net/mlx5: Fix wrong comment Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 06/14] net/mlx5: Modify struct mlx5_irq to use struct msi_map Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 07/14] net/mlx5: Use newer affinity descriptor Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 08/14] net/mlx5: Improve naming of pci function vectors Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 09/14] net/mlx5: Refactor completion irq request/release code Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 10/14] net/mlx5: Use dynamic msix vectors allocation Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 11/14] net/mlx5: Move devlink registration before mlx5_load Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 12/14] net/mlx5: Refactor calculation of required completion vectors Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 13/14] net/mlx5: Use one completion vector if eth is disabled Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 14/14] net/mlx5: Provide external API for allocating vectors Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-22 3:49 ` [pull request][net-next 00/14] mlx5 updates 2023-03-20 Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-22 20:24 ` Jacob Keller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230321203836.5ab4951e@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=elic@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=saeed@kernel.org \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).