From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/core: add optional threading for backlog processing
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 10:47:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230324104733.571466bc@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2d251879-1cf4-237d-8e62-c42bb4feb047@nbd.name>
On Fri, 24 Mar 2023 18:35:00 +0100 Felix Fietkau wrote:
> I'm primarily testing this on routers with 2 or 4 CPUs and limited
> processing power, handling routing/NAT. RPS is typically needed to
> properly distribute the load across all available CPUs. When there is
> only a small number of flows that are pushing a lot of traffic, a static
> RPS assignment often leaves some CPUs idle, whereas others become a
> bottleneck by being fully loaded. Threaded NAPI reduces this a bit, but
> CPUs can become bottlenecked and fully loaded by a NAPI thread alone.
The NAPI thread becomes a bottleneck with RPS enabled?
> Making backlog processing threaded helps split up the processing work
> even more and distribute it onto remaining idle CPUs.
You'd want to have both threaded NAPI and threaded backlog enabled?
> It can basically be used to make RPS a bit more dynamic and
> configurable, because you can assign multiple backlog threads to a set
> of CPUs and selectively steer packets from specific devices / rx queues
Can you give an example?
With the 4 CPU example, in case 2 queues are very busy - you're trying
to make sure that the RPS does not end up landing on the same CPU as
the other busy queue?
> to them and allow the scheduler to take care of the rest.
You trust the scheduler much more than I do, I think :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-24 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-24 17:13 [PATCH net-next] net/core: add optional threading for backlog processing Felix Fietkau
2023-03-24 17:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-24 17:35 ` Felix Fietkau
2023-03-24 17:47 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-03-24 17:57 ` Felix Fietkau
2023-03-25 3:19 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-25 5:42 ` Felix Fietkau
2023-03-28 2:06 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-28 9:46 ` Felix Fietkau
2023-03-28 9:29 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-03-28 9:45 ` Felix Fietkau
2023-03-28 15:13 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-03-28 15:21 ` Felix Fietkau
2023-03-29 16:14 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230324104733.571466bc@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nbd@nbd.name \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).