From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Emeel Hakim <ehakim@nvidia.com>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <pabeni@redhat.com>, <edumazet@google.com>,
<sd@queasysnail.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] vlan: Add MACsec offload operations for VLAN interface
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 09:43:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230327094335.07f462f9@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230326072636.3507-2-ehakim@nvidia.com>
On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 10:26:33 +0300 Emeel Hakim wrote:
> @@ -572,6 +573,9 @@ static int vlan_dev_init(struct net_device *dev)
> NETIF_F_HIGHDMA | NETIF_F_SCTP_CRC |
> NETIF_F_ALL_FCOE;
>
> + if (real_dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_MACSEC)
> + dev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_HW_MACSEC;
> +
> dev->features |= dev->hw_features | NETIF_F_LLTX;
> netif_inherit_tso_max(dev, real_dev);
> if (dev->features & NETIF_F_VLAN_FEATURES)
> @@ -660,6 +664,9 @@ static netdev_features_t vlan_dev_fix_features(struct net_device *dev,
> features |= old_features & (NETIF_F_SOFT_FEATURES | NETIF_F_GSO_SOFTWARE);
> features |= NETIF_F_LLTX;
>
> + if (real_dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_MACSEC)
> + features |= NETIF_F_HW_MACSEC;
> +
> return features;
> }
Shouldn't vlan_features be consulted somehow?
> @@ -803,6 +810,49 @@ static int vlan_dev_fill_forward_path(struct net_device_path_ctx *ctx,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MACSEC)
> +#define VLAN_MACSEC_MDO(mdo) \
> +static int vlan_macsec_ ## mdo(struct macsec_context *ctx) \
> +{ \
> + const struct macsec_ops *ops; \
> + ops = vlan_dev_priv(ctx->netdev)->real_dev->macsec_ops; \
> + return ops ? ops->mdo_ ## mdo(ctx) : -EOPNOTSUPP; \
> +}
> +
> +#define VLAN_MACSEC_DECLARE_MDO(mdo) vlan_macsec_ ## mdo
> +
> +VLAN_MACSEC_MDO(add_txsa);
> +VLAN_MACSEC_MDO(upd_txsa);
> +VLAN_MACSEC_MDO(del_txsa);
> +
> +VLAN_MACSEC_MDO(add_rxsa);
> +VLAN_MACSEC_MDO(upd_rxsa);
> +VLAN_MACSEC_MDO(del_rxsa);
> +
> +VLAN_MACSEC_MDO(add_rxsc);
> +VLAN_MACSEC_MDO(upd_rxsc);
> +VLAN_MACSEC_MDO(del_rxsc);
> +
> +VLAN_MACSEC_MDO(add_secy);
> +VLAN_MACSEC_MDO(upd_secy);
> +VLAN_MACSEC_MDO(del_secy);
-1
impossible to grep for the functions :( but maybe others don't care
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-27 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-26 7:26 [PATCH net-next 0/4] Support MACsec VLAN Emeel Hakim
2023-03-26 7:26 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] vlan: Add MACsec offload operations for VLAN interface Emeel Hakim
2023-03-27 16:43 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-03-28 6:54 ` Emeel Hakim
2023-03-28 18:20 ` Francois Romieu
2023-03-29 11:07 ` Emeel Hakim
2023-03-28 22:41 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-29 11:08 ` Emeel Hakim
2023-03-26 7:26 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] net/mlx5: Support MACsec over VLAN Emeel Hakim
2023-03-26 7:26 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] net/mlx5: Consider VLAN interface in MACsec TX steering rules Emeel Hakim
2023-03-26 7:26 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] macsec: Add MACsec rx_handler change support Emeel Hakim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230327094335.07f462f9@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=ehakim@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).