From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F56CC76196 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 11:22:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232429AbjC1LWG (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2023 07:22:06 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33064 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232377AbjC1LWF (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2023 07:22:05 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x32c.google.com (mail-wm1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8F3A7D9A; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 04:21:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id s13so6705019wmr.4; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 04:21:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1680002517; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=slvp/Lh/A2Cql09K0z7xHRMQAgWLXzuT8obGzP7qfCk=; b=KU1v0Fx4pnv1ZCVQH4jp0KoRE4V+rcGx0RcLrPGetxThL36IsY0cdWosFkiDefHuAV CqymSSCvpyC4uv8qt2/CLvwSiWoHq12OSLbPUPUx8Iw7Ye2J39PW0szVqxtVVcPMFN0/ L299LPc34Fdlfqx/Qz2ztzwX/hduA+P7bb9V8Uw+cTYOSGTmKdYPE5mYCWGdSRA9RNqQ PNhp8VqQlom8Sk/kPpJTWpLqYRh8joXl5UFkg9ryTcAutGOOCDGzdPJUNJ/15FPTBkXq Pj0wm7Ej1ewq0qzrcA2gob4gdTpQGA/g8xLxQWOY2PrpBqidYksWzE8tVPEtBj9cOk4z Dvgw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1680002517; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=slvp/Lh/A2Cql09K0z7xHRMQAgWLXzuT8obGzP7qfCk=; b=Pb+6LRPl74aE8daGOK2Q9Ls9t79SGgOYq/GFGzuIOUFMTcT2aynBlgPOceduWzzL8K +JvfmDX/sPjN0JXREtesl25yld2k8t+r0xUreFLwJxMiilraMX/H0NUwfFOqnwhBT1HF dZyH2oceX6ATGFtcy9K2HfzfaNumPnzmq7t2rrLQtNtijXSuF6aiT5FM6tx0ThZsAzR0 M1TdYiRWa6dXkd++4x3LBf6p9ytKTNrYgqIkWSclUfZhmvDeOVTdcq4hLenJo/4z51cd 3kNa8CGNAT0xQP50dyi2E+HUqhuu7BQm4GLw0Fvtv3pjm/KKGROjNTL1sIaUY5bQ+zgA 50qw== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWE43f5VZjKfF1lRM5uPfz1BeS9zCaHZynzQNIUhuFSEhrN+gkn Q1RCGNTjZIMBhZ8wYgqkpxg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set8kjZ2lZPkSladu0ABr5wkk+sKce4J1PUAbHXmMAzrtQEwWAjBFTHklV6EO9Gy91f5+K1M7PQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:20d:b0:3ed:6693:138d with SMTP id 13-20020a05600c020d00b003ed6693138dmr11760571wmi.4.1680002517204; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 04:21:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from skbuf ([188.27.184.189]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w13-20020a1cf60d000000b003ed4f6c6234sm16782604wmc.23.2023.03.28.04.21.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 28 Mar 2023 04:21:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 14:21:54 +0300 From: Vladimir Oltean To: arinc9.unal@gmail.com Cc: Sean Wang , Landen Chao , DENG Qingfang , Andrew Lunn , Florian Fainelli , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Russell King , =?utf-8?B?UmVuw6k=?= van Dorst , Russell King , Ilya Lipnitskiy , Richard van Schagen , Richard van Schagen , Frank Wunderlich , =?utf-8?B?QXLEsW7DpyDDnE5BTA==?= , erkin.bozoglu@xeront.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] net: dsa: mt7530: fix port 5 phylink, phy muxing, and port 6 Message-ID: <20230328112154.qk5fwqaig4sit3ho@skbuf> References: <20230326140818.246575-1-arinc.unal@arinc9.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230326140818.246575-1-arinc.unal@arinc9.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 05:08:11PM +0300, arinc9.unal@gmail.com wrote: > Hello! > > This patch series is mainly focused on fixing the support for port 5 and > setting up port 6. > > The only missing piece to properly support port 5 as a CPU port is the > fixes [0] [1] [2] from Richard. > > Russell, looking forward to your review regarding phylink. > > I have very thoroughly tested the patch series with every possible mode to > use. I'll let the name of the dtb files speak for themselves. This patch needs to be resubmitted (potentially as RFC) to the net-next tree, and the commits readjusted to clarify what are fixes and what is pure refactoring. With the mentioned that I have not reviewed the entire series and I will not do that, either.