netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Dima Chumak <dchumak@nvidia.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] devlink: Add port function attributes to enable/disable IPsec crypto and packet offloads
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 10:05:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230329100557.40890e35@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <93f74c83-d2e9-3448-9f07-64214cc0f7f8@nvidia.com>

On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 09:42:51 +0200 Dima Chumak wrote:
> > Is it fine grained? How many keys can each VF allocate?  
> 
> When I referred to "fine grained" control, I was talking about the
> different types of IPsec offload (crypto and packet offload) in the
> software stack. Specifically, the ip xfrm command has sub-commands for
> "state" and "policy" that have an "offload" parameter. With ip xfrm
> state, both crypto and packet offload types are supported, while ip xfrm
> policy can only be offloaded in packet mode.
> 
> The goal is to provide a similar level of granularity for controlling VF
> IPsec offload capabilities, which would be consistent with the software
> model. This will allow users to decide if they want both types of
> offload enabled for a VF, just one of them, or none at all (which is the
> default).

Ack, please add a reference or explanation somewhere and fix
the posting.

      reply	other threads:[~2023-03-29 17:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-23 11:10 [PATCH net-next 0/4] devlink: Add port function attributes to enable/disable IPsec crypto and packet offloads Dima Chumak
2023-03-23 11:10 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] devlink: Expose port function commands to control IPsec crypto offloads Dima Chumak
2023-03-23 11:10 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] net/mlx5: Implement devlink port function cmds to control ipsec_crypto Dima Chumak
2023-03-23 21:49   ` kernel test robot
2023-03-29  8:01   ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-03-23 11:10 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] devlink: Expose port function commands to control IPsec packet offloads Dima Chumak
2023-03-23 11:10 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] net/mlx5: Implement devlink port function cmds to control ipsec_packet Dima Chumak
2023-03-23 11:13 ` [PATCH iproute2-next 1/3] Update kernel headers Dima Chumak
2023-03-23 11:13 ` [PATCH iproute2-next 2/3] devlink: Support setting port function ipsec_crypto cap Dima Chumak
2023-03-23 11:13 ` [PATCH iproute2-next 3/3] devlink: Support setting port function ipsec_packet cap Dima Chumak
2023-03-23 17:05 ` [PATCH net-next 0/4] devlink: Add port function attributes to enable/disable IPsec crypto and packet offloads Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-29  7:45   ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-03-29 17:09     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-29 19:11       ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-03-23 17:23 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-29  7:42   ` Dima Chumak
2023-03-29 17:05     ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230329100557.40890e35@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dchumak@nvidia.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).