From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] ksz884x: remove unused #defines
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 09:00:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230406090017.0fc0ae34@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <454a61709e442f717fbde4b0ebb8b4c3fdfb515e.camel@redhat.com>
On Thu, 06 Apr 2023 15:37:36 +0200 Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-04-05 at 10:39 +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> > Remove unused #defines from ksz884x driver.
> >
> > These #defines may have some value in documenting the hardware.
> > But that information may be accessed via scm history.
>
> I personally have a slight preference for keeping these definitions in
> the sources (for doc purposes), but it's not a big deal.
>
> Any 3rd opinion more then welcome!
I had the same reaction, FWIW.
Cleaning up unused "code" macros, pure software stuff makes perfect
sense. But I feel a bit ambivalent about removing definitions of HW
registers and bits.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-06 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-05 8:39 [PATCH net-next 0/3] ksz884x: remove unused functions and #defines Simon Horman
2023-04-05 8:39 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] ksz884x: remove commented-out #defines Simon Horman
2023-04-05 8:39 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] ksz884x: remove unused #defines Simon Horman
2023-04-06 13:37 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-04-06 16:00 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-04-06 16:12 ` Simon Horman
2023-04-06 17:44 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-04-06 20:06 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-04-05 8:39 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] ksz884x: remove unused functions Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230406090017.0fc0ae34@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).