From: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com>
To: kuba@kernel.org, alexander.duyck@gmail.com,
ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org, hawk@kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, liangchen.linux@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] skbuff: Fix a race between coalescing and releasing SKBs
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 19:48:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230406114825.18597-1-liangchen.linux@gmail.com> (raw)
Commit 1effe8ca4e34 ("skbuff: fix coalescing for page_pool fragment
recycling") allowed coalescing to proceed with non page pool page and
page pool page when @from is cloned, i.e.
to->pp_recycle --> false
from->pp_recycle --> true
skb_cloned(from) --> true
However, it actually requires skb_cloned(@from) to hold true until
coalescing finishes in this situation. If the other cloned SKB is
released while the merging is in process, from_shinfo->nr_frags will be
set to 0 towards the end of the function, causing the increment of frag
page _refcount to be unexpectedly skipped resulting in inconsistent
reference counts. Later when SKB(@to) is released, it frees the page
directly even though the page pool page is still in use, leading to
use-after-free or double-free errors.
So it needs to be specially handled at where the ref count may get lost.
The double-free error message below prompted us to investigate:
BUG: Bad page state in process swapper/1 pfn:0e0d1
page:00000000c6548b28 refcount:-1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000
index:0x2 pfn:0xe0d1
flags: 0xfffffc0000000(node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x1fffff)
raw: 000fffffc0000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff00000101 0000000000000000
raw: 0000000000000002 0000000000000000 ffffffffffffffff 0000000000000000
page dumped because: nonzero _refcount
CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Tainted: G E 6.2.0+
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
dump_stack_lvl+0x32/0x50
bad_page+0x69/0xf0
free_pcp_prepare+0x260/0x2f0
free_unref_page+0x20/0x1c0
skb_release_data+0x10b/0x1a0
napi_consume_skb+0x56/0x150
net_rx_action+0xf0/0x350
? __napi_schedule+0x79/0x90
__do_softirq+0xc8/0x2b1
__irq_exit_rcu+0xb9/0xf0
common_interrupt+0x82/0xa0
</IRQ>
<TASK>
asm_common_interrupt+0x22/0x40
RIP: 0010:default_idle+0xb/0x20
Signed-off-by: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com>
---
Changes from v1:
- deal with the ref count problem instead of return back to give more opportunities to coalesce skbs.
---
net/core/skbuff.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index 050a875d09c5..77da8ce74a1e 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -5643,7 +5643,19 @@ bool skb_try_coalesce(struct sk_buff *to, struct sk_buff *from,
skb_fill_page_desc(to, to_shinfo->nr_frags,
page, offset, skb_headlen(from));
- *fragstolen = true;
+
+ /* When @from is pp_recycle and @to isn't, coalescing is
+ * allowed to proceed if @from is cloned. However if the
+ * execution reaches this point, @from is already transitioned
+ * into non-cloned because the other cloned skb is released
+ * somewhere else concurrently. In this case, we need to make
+ * sure the ref count is incremented, not directly stealing
+ * from page pool.
+ */
+ if (to->pp_recycle != from->pp_recycle)
+ get_page(page);
+ else
+ *fragstolen = true;
} else {
if (to_shinfo->nr_frags +
from_shinfo->nr_frags > MAX_SKB_FRAGS)
@@ -5659,7 +5671,13 @@ bool skb_try_coalesce(struct sk_buff *to, struct sk_buff *from,
from_shinfo->nr_frags * sizeof(skb_frag_t));
to_shinfo->nr_frags += from_shinfo->nr_frags;
- if (!skb_cloned(from))
+ /* Same situation as above where head data presents. When @from is
+ * pp_recycle and @to isn't, coalescing is allowed to proceed if @from
+ * is cloned. However @from can be transitioned into non-cloned
+ * concurrently by this point. If it does happen, we need to make sure
+ * the ref count is properly incremented.
+ */
+ if (to->pp_recycle == from->pp_recycle && !skb_cloned(from))
from_shinfo->nr_frags = 0;
/* if the skb is not cloned this does nothing
--
2.18.2
next reply other threads:[~2023-04-06 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-06 11:48 Liang Chen [this message]
2023-04-06 15:25 ` [PATCH v2] skbuff: Fix a race between coalescing and releasing SKBs Alexander H Duyck
2023-04-07 8:02 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2023-04-10 7:26 ` Liang Chen
2023-04-07 8:06 ` Yunsheng Lin
2023-04-07 15:01 ` Alexander Duyck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230406114825.18597-1-liangchen.linux@gmail.com \
--to=liangchen.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).