Re: [Question] Any plan to write/update the bridge doc?

[Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>]

On Mon, 24 Apr 2023 18:46:53 +0300
Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 05:25:08PM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Maybe someone already has asked. The only official Linux bridge document I
> > got is a very ancient wiki page[1] or the ip link man page[2][3]. As there are
> > many bridge stp/vlan/multicast paramegers. Should we add a detailed kernel
> > document about each parameter? The parameter showed in ip link page seems
> > a little brief.  
> 
> I suggest improving the man pages instead of adding kernel
> documentation. The man pages are the most up to date resource and
> therefore the one users probably refer to the most. Also, it's already
> quite annoying to patch both "ip-link" and "bridge" man pages when
> adding bridge port options. Adding a third document and making sure all
> three resources are patched would be a nightmare...
> 
> > 
> > I'd like to help do this work. But apparently neither my English nor my
> > understanding of the code is good enough. Anyway, if you want, I can help
> > write a draft version first and you (bridge maintainers) keep working on this.  
> 
> I can help reviewing man page patches if you want. I'm going to send
> some soon. Will copy you.
> 
> > 
> > [1] https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/networking/bridge
> > [2] https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/bridge.8.html
> > [3] https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/ip-link.8.html
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Hangbin  

Yes, please update the iproute2 man pages.
From there, I can make the old wiki just be a reference to them.
And Michael will pickup the man7.org versions from the current iproute2.

The iproute2 git tree is single source of current documentation please.