netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
To: <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>, <linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>,
	<luiz.dentz@gmail.com>, <marcel@holtmann.org>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Subject: Re: Fw: [Bug 217383] New: Bluetooth: L2CAP: possible data race in __sco_sock_close()
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 10:27:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230428172721.56267-1-kuniyu@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230428085239.1cb74647@hermes.local>

From:   Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Date:   Fri, 28 Apr 2023 08:52:39 -0700
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 10:22:28 +0000
> From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org
> To: stephen@networkplumber.org
> Subject: [Bug 217383] New: Bluetooth: L2CAP: possible data race in __sco_sock_close()
> 
> 
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217383
> 
>             Bug ID: 217383
>            Summary: Bluetooth: L2CAP: possible data race in
>                     __sco_sock_close()
>            Product: Networking
>            Version: 2.5
>           Hardware: All
>                 OS: Linux
>             Status: NEW
>           Severity: normal
>           Priority: P3
>          Component: Other
>           Assignee: stephen@networkplumber.org
>           Reporter: islituo@gmail.com
>         Regression: No
> 
> Our static analysis tool finds a possible data race in the l2cap protocol
> in Linux 6.3.0-rc7:
> 
> In most calling contexts, the variable sk->sk_socket is accessed
> with holding the lock sk->sk_callback_lock. Here is an example:
> 
>   l2cap_sock_accept() --> Line 346 in net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
>       bt_accept_dequeue() --> Line 368 in net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
>           sock_graft() --> Line 240 in net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c
>               write_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock); --> Line 2081 in
> include/net/sock.h (Lock sk->sk_callback_lock)
>               sk_set_socket() --> Line 2084 in include/net/sock.h
>                   sk->sk_socket = sock; --> Line 2054 in include/net/sock.h
> (Access sk->sk_socket)
> 
> However, in the following calling context:
> 
>   sco_sock_shutdown() --> Line 1227 in net/bluetooth/sco.c
>       __sco_sock_close() --> Line 1243 in net/bluetooth/sco.c
>           BT_DBG(..., sk->sk_socket); --> Line 431 in net/bluetooth/sco.c
> (Access sk->sk_socket)

Those two sockets have different proto, BTPROTO_L2CAP and BTPROTO_SCO.
Also, we cannot shutdown() for not-yet-accepted socket, and both
l2cap_sock_accept() and sco_sock_shutdown() take lock_sock().


> 
> the variable sk->sk_socket is accessed without holding the lock
> sk->sk_callback_lock, and thus a data race may occur.
> 
> Reported-by: BassCheck <bass@buaa.edu.cn>
> 
> -- 
> You may reply to this email to add a comment.
> 
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You are the assignee for the bug.

      reply	other threads:[~2023-04-28 17:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-28 15:52 Fw: [Bug 217383] New: Bluetooth: L2CAP: possible data race in __sco_sock_close() Stephen Hemminger
2023-04-28 17:27 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230428172721.56267-1-kuniyu@amazon.com \
    --to=kuniyu@amazon.com \
    --cc=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luiz.dentz@gmail.com \
    --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).