netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
	Pawel Chmielewski <pawel.chmielewski@intel.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>, Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 8/8] lib: test for_each_numa_cpus()
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2023 10:18:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230430171809.124686-9-yury.norov@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230430171809.124686-1-yury.norov@gmail.com>

Test for_each_numa_cpus() output to ensure that:
 - all CPUs are picked from NUMA nodes with non-decreasing distances to the
   original node; 
 - only online CPUs are enumerated;
 - the macro enumerates each online CPUs only once;
 - enumeration order is consistent with cpumask_local_spread().

The latter is an implementation-defined behavior. If cpumask_local_spread()
or for_each_numa_cpu() will get changed in future, the subtest may need
to be adjusted or even removed, as appropriate.

It's useful now because some architectures don't implement numa_distance(),
and generic implementation only distinguishes local and remote nodes, which
doesn't allow to test the for_each_numa_cpu() properly.

Suggested-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> (for node_distance() test)
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
---
 lib/test_bitmap.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/test_bitmap.c b/lib/test_bitmap.c
index a8005ad3bd58..ac4fe621d37b 100644
--- a/lib/test_bitmap.c
+++ b/lib/test_bitmap.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 #include <linux/printk.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/string.h>
+#include <linux/topology.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 
 #include "../tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_module.h"
@@ -71,6 +72,16 @@ __check_eq_uint(const char *srcfile, unsigned int line,
 	return true;
 }
 
+static bool __init
+__check_ge_uint(const char *srcfile, unsigned int line,
+		const unsigned int exp_uint, unsigned int x)
+{
+	if (exp_uint >=  x)
+		return true;
+
+	pr_err("[%s:%u] expected >= %u, got %u\n", srcfile, line, exp_uint, x);
+	return false;
+}
 
 static bool __init
 __check_eq_bitmap(const char *srcfile, unsigned int line,
@@ -86,6 +97,18 @@ __check_eq_bitmap(const char *srcfile, unsigned int line,
 	return true;
 }
 
+static bool __init
+__check_eq_cpumask(const char *srcfile, unsigned int line,
+		  const struct cpumask *exp_cpumask, const struct cpumask *cpumask)
+{
+	if (cpumask_equal(exp_cpumask, cpumask))
+		return true;
+
+	pr_warn("[%s:%u] cpumasks contents differ: expected \"%*pbl\", got \"%*pbl\"\n",
+		srcfile, line, cpumask_pr_args(exp_cpumask), cpumask_pr_args(cpumask));
+	return false;
+}
+
 static bool __init
 __check_eq_pbl(const char *srcfile, unsigned int line,
 	       const char *expected_pbl,
@@ -173,11 +196,11 @@ __check_eq_str(const char *srcfile, unsigned int line,
 	return eq;
 }
 
-#define __expect_eq(suffix, ...)					\
+#define __expect(suffix, ...)						\
 	({								\
 		int result = 0;						\
 		total_tests++;						\
-		if (!__check_eq_ ## suffix(__FILE__, __LINE__,		\
+		if (!__check_ ## suffix(__FILE__, __LINE__,		\
 					   ##__VA_ARGS__)) {		\
 			failed_tests++;					\
 			result = 1;					\
@@ -185,13 +208,19 @@ __check_eq_str(const char *srcfile, unsigned int line,
 		result;							\
 	})
 
+#define __expect_eq(suffix, ...)	__expect(eq_ ## suffix, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+#define __expect_ge(suffix, ...)	__expect(ge_ ## suffix, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+
 #define expect_eq_uint(...)		__expect_eq(uint, ##__VA_ARGS__)
 #define expect_eq_bitmap(...)		__expect_eq(bitmap, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+#define expect_eq_cpumask(...)		__expect_eq(cpumask, ##__VA_ARGS__)
 #define expect_eq_pbl(...)		__expect_eq(pbl, ##__VA_ARGS__)
 #define expect_eq_u32_array(...)	__expect_eq(u32_array, ##__VA_ARGS__)
 #define expect_eq_clump8(...)		__expect_eq(clump8, ##__VA_ARGS__)
 #define expect_eq_str(...)		__expect_eq(str, ##__VA_ARGS__)
 
+#define expect_ge_uint(...)		__expect_ge(uint, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+
 static void __init test_zero_clear(void)
 {
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(bmap, 1024);
@@ -751,6 +780,42 @@ static void __init test_for_each_set_bit_wrap(void)
 	}
 }
 
+static void __init test_for_each_numa_cpu(void)
+{
+	unsigned int node, cpu, hop;
+	cpumask_var_t mask;
+
+	if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
+		pr_err("Can't allocate cpumask. Skipping for_each_numa_cpu() test");
+		return;
+	}
+
+	for_each_node(node) {
+		unsigned int c = 0, dist, old_dist = node_distance(node, node);
+
+		cpumask_clear(mask);
+
+		rcu_read_lock();
+		for_each_numa_cpu(cpu, hop, node, cpu_possible_mask) {
+			dist = node_distance(cpu_to_node(cpu), node);
+
+			/* Distance between nodes must never decrease */
+			expect_ge_uint(dist, old_dist);
+
+			/* Test for coherence with cpumask_local_spread() */
+			expect_eq_uint(cpumask_local_spread(c++, node), cpu);
+
+			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mask);
+			old_dist = dist;
+		}
+		rcu_read_unlock();
+
+		/* Each online CPU must be visited exactly once */
+		expect_eq_uint(c, num_online_cpus());
+		expect_eq_cpumask(mask, cpu_online_mask);
+	}
+}
+
 static void __init test_for_each_set_bit(void)
 {
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(orig, 500);
@@ -1237,6 +1302,7 @@ static void __init selftest(void)
 	test_for_each_clear_bitrange_from();
 	test_for_each_set_clump8();
 	test_for_each_set_bit_wrap();
+	test_for_each_numa_cpu();
 }
 
 KSTM_MODULE_LOADERS(test_bitmap);
-- 
2.37.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-30 17:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-30 17:18 [PATCH v2 0/8] sched/topology: add for_each_numa_cpu() macro Yury Norov
2023-04-30 17:18 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] sched: fix sched_numa_find_nth_cpu() in non-NUMA case Yury Norov
2023-04-30 17:18 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] lib/find: add find_next_and_andnot_bit() Yury Norov
2023-04-30 17:18 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] sched/topology: introduce sched_numa_find_next_cpu() Yury Norov
2023-04-30 17:18 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] sched/topology: add for_each_numa_{,online}_cpu() macro Yury Norov
2023-04-30 17:18 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] net: mlx5: switch comp_irqs_request() to using for_each_numa_cpu Yury Norov
2023-04-30 17:18 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] lib/cpumask: update comment to cpumask_local_spread() Yury Norov
2023-04-30 17:18 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] sched: drop for_each_numa_hop_mask() Yury Norov
2023-04-30 17:18 ` Yury Norov [this message]
2023-07-22 15:47   ` [PATCH v3 8/8] lib: test for_each_numa_cpus() Guenter Roeck
2023-07-27  2:11     ` Yury Norov
2023-05-02 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] sched/topology: add for_each_numa_cpu() macro Valentin Schneider
2023-05-02 21:58   ` Yury Norov
2023-05-03 10:00     ` Valentin Schneider
2023-05-31 15:43 ` Yury Norov
2023-05-31 17:01   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-31 17:08     ` Yury Norov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230430171809.124686-9-yury.norov@gmail.com \
    --to=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gal@nvidia.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pawel.chmielewski@intel.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).