From: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
To: Ron Eggler <ron.eggler@mistywest.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Unable to TX data on VSC8531
Date: Tue, 2 May 2023 09:11:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230502071135.bcxg5nip62m7wndb@soft-dev3-1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2c2bade5-01d5-7065-13e6-56fcdbf92b5a@mistywest.com>
The 05/01/2023 13:34, Ron Eggler wrote:
Hi Ron,
>
> Hi Horatiu,
>
> [snip greetings]
>
> > I've posted here previously about the bring up of two network interfaces
> > on an embedded platform that is using two the Microsemi VSC8531 PHYs.
> > (previous thread: issues to bring up two VSC8531 PHYs, Thanks to Heiner
> > Kallweit & Andrew Lunn).
> > I'm able to seemingly fully access & operate the network interfaces
> > through ifconfig (and the ip commands) and I set the ip address to match
> > my /24 network. However, while it looks like I can receive & see traffic
> > on the line with tcpdump, it appears like none of my frames can go out
> > in TX direction and hence entries in my arp table mostly remain
> > incomplete (and if there actually happens to be a complete entry,
> > sending anything to it doesn't seem to work and the TX counters in
> > ifconfig stay at 0. How can I further troubleshoot this? I have set the
> > phy-mode to rgmii-id in the device tree and have experimented with all
> > the TX_CLK delay register settings in the PHY but have failed to make
> > any progress.
> > Some of the VSC phys have this COMA mode, and then you need to pull
> > down a GPIO to take it out of this mode. I looked a little bit but I
> > didn't find anything like this for VSC8531 but maybe you can double
> > check this. But in that case both the RX and TX will not work.
> > Are there any errors seen in the registers 16 (0x10) or register 17
> > (0x11)?
> Good point rewgarding the COMA mode, I have not found anything like it.
> The RGMII connectivity should be pretty straight forward per the
> datasheet, TX0-TX4, TX_CLK, TX_CTL, RXD0-RXD4, RX_CLK & RX_CTL.
> Not sure if you've seen this in the subthread that is ongoing with
> Andrew Lunn but as part of it, I did invoke the mii-tool and got a
> pretty printout of the PHY registers, see below:
>
> # mii-tool -vv eth0
> Using SIOCGMIIPHY=0x8947
> eth0: negotiated 100baseTx-FD, link ok
> registers for MII PHY 0:
> 1040 796d 0007 0572 01e1 45e1 0005 2801
> 0000 0300 4000 0000 0000 0000 0000 3000
> 9000 0000 0008 0000 0000 0000 3201 1000
> 0000 a020 0000 0000 802d 0021 0400 0000
Unfortunetly, I can't see anything obvious wrong with the registers.
> product info: vendor 00:01:c1, model 23 rev 2
> basic mode: autonegotiation enabled
> basic status: autonegotiation complete, link ok
> capabilities: 1000baseT-HD 1000baseT-FD 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD
> 10baseT-FD 10baseT-HD
> advertising: 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD 10baseT-FD 10baseT-HD
Are you expecting to run at 100Mbit?
> link partner: 1000baseT-HD 1000baseT-FD 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD
> 10baseT-FD 10baseT-HD flow-control
>
> Alternartively, the registers can be read with phytool also:
>
> # phytool read eth0/0/0x10
> 0x9000
> # phytool read eth0/0/0x11
> 0000
Another thing that you can try, is to put a probe and see if you
actually see the TXCLK? And if I understand correctly that should be at
25MHz (because the link speed is 100Mbit).
>
> --
> Ron
--
/Horatiu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-02 7:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-30 14:08 Unable to TX data on VSC8531 Ron Eggler
2023-04-30 14:23 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-05-01 19:57 ` Ron Eggler
2023-05-01 20:12 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-05-01 20:23 ` Ron Eggler
2023-05-01 6:46 ` Horatiu Vultur
2023-05-01 20:34 ` Ron Eggler
2023-05-02 7:11 ` Horatiu Vultur [this message]
2023-05-02 20:16 ` Ron Eggler
2023-05-02 20:50 ` Horatiu Vultur
2023-05-04 19:25 ` Ron Eggler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230502071135.bcxg5nip62m7wndb@soft-dev3-1 \
--to=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ron.eggler@mistywest.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).