netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Manish Chopra <manishc@marvell.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <aelior@marvell.com>,
	<palok@marvell.com>, Sudarsana Kalluru <skalluru@marvell.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net] qed/qede: Fix scheduling while atomic
Date: Tue, 2 May 2023 20:03:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230502200307.11bbe4ef@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230428102651.01215795@hermes.local>

On Fri, 28 Apr 2023 10:26:51 -0700 Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Apr 2023 09:13:37 -0700
> Manish Chopra <manishc@marvell.com> wrote:
> 
> > -		usleep_range(1000, 2000);
> > +
> > +		if (is_atomic)
> > +			udelay(QED_BAR_ACQUIRE_TIMEOUT_UDELAY);
> > +		else
> > +			usleep_range(QED_BAR_ACQUIRE_TIMEOUT_USLEEP,
> > +				     QED_BAR_ACQUIRE_TIMEOUT_USLEEP * 2);
> >  	}  
> 
> This is a variant of the conditional locking which is an ugly design pattern.
> It makes static checking tools break and
> a source of more bugs.
> 
> Better to fix the infrastructure or caller to not spin, or have two different
> functions.

FWIW the most common way to solve this issue is using a delayed work
which reads out the stats periodically from a non-atomic context, and
return a stashed copy from get_stat64.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-03  3:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-28 16:13 [PATCH v3 net] qed/qede: Fix scheduling while atomic Manish Chopra
2023-04-28 17:26 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-05-03  3:03   ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-05-17 20:10     ` [EXT] " Manish Chopra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230502200307.11bbe4ef@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=aelior@marvell.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=manishc@marvell.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=palok@marvell.com \
    --cc=skalluru@marvell.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).