From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE9CA7491 for ; Tue, 2 May 2023 20:50:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com (esa.microchip.iphmx.com [68.232.153.233]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B3B51BC1 for ; Tue, 2 May 2023 13:50:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1683060627; x=1714596627; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=ZJYVsn3vXZvhrmw2j6cXAzO6uYh3kmoJnZnFB4a7FTI=; b=KtuRvXjeZI03EpM0569BtCUIgSkgp9fwHA4BpJlqomw/6cnpEAL7zNLQ 047bqHp9V79u8Fazgl7Vmabmd/WRuSlA2KxddAMAHdPCyUXkVIxELPdS3 mED30J56d8L01aSoNYavYFuSlsOJPvArDP8kRZCUISUf/G8A2uWWoFJas CipnAk9z2owutYoAHteFy4+oUUzLabjMOQh5WeGiPA/zEvAYQjDmNS9rv RAoMI9mJb9yF5R9+M8VG5pW6bUz3LwivmOSoEdVVjTERG12roRngtUkBa DV77E7OcYrqn/S2T285k2gUtJL8f1/VhtGeFR3MYRHVFJhqGUDmLcIJxq w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.99,245,1677567600"; d="scan'208";a="211646285" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) Received: from unknown (HELO email.microchip.com) ([170.129.1.10]) by esa3.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 02 May 2023 13:50:27 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) by chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.21; Tue, 2 May 2023 13:50:27 -0700 Received: from localhost (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.2507.21 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 2 May 2023 13:50:27 -0700 Date: Tue, 2 May 2023 22:50:26 +0200 From: Horatiu Vultur To: Ron Eggler CC: Subject: Re: Unable to TX data on VSC8531 Message-ID: <20230502205026.3h6nmwnotlgbfl5o@soft-dev3-1> References: <20230501064655.2ovbo3yhkym3zu57@soft-dev3-1> <2c2bade5-01d5-7065-13e6-56fcdbf92b5a@mistywest.com> <20230502071135.bcxg5nip62m7wndb@soft-dev3-1> <0ba220c3-1a89-69ff-4c90-e2777a0dd04e@mistywest.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0ba220c3-1a89-69ff-4c90-e2777a0dd04e@mistywest.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net The 05/02/2023 13:16, Ron Eggler wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe > > Hi Horatiu, > > On 2023-05-02 12:11 a.m., Horatiu Vultur wrote: > > The 05/01/2023 13:34, Ron Eggler wrote: > > > > [snip greetings] > > > > > > I've posted here previously about the bring up of two network interfaces > > > > on an embedded platform that is using two the Microsemi VSC8531 PHYs. > > > > (previous thread: issues to bring up two VSC8531 PHYs, Thanks to Heiner > > > > Kallweit & Andrew Lunn). > > > > I'm able to seemingly fully access & operate the network interfaces > > > > through ifconfig (and the ip commands) and I set the ip address to match > > > > my /24 network. However, while it looks like I can receive & see traffic > > > > on the line with tcpdump, it appears like none of my frames can go out > > > > in TX direction and hence entries in my arp table mostly remain > > > > incomplete (and if there actually happens to be a complete entry, > > > > sending anything to it doesn't seem to work and the TX counters in > > > > ifconfig stay at 0. How can I further troubleshoot this? I have set the > > > > phy-mode to rgmii-id in the device tree and have experimented with all > > > > the TX_CLK delay register settings in the PHY but have failed to make > > > > any progress. > > > > Some of the VSC phys have this COMA mode, and then you need to pull > > > > down a GPIO to take it out of this mode. I looked a little bit but I > > > > didn't find anything like this for VSC8531 but maybe you can double > > > > check this. But in that case both the RX and TX will not work. > > > > Are there any errors seen in the registers 16 (0x10) or register 17 > > > > (0x11)? > > > Good point rewgarding the COMA mode, I have not found anything like it. > > > The RGMII connectivity should be pretty straight forward per the > > > datasheet, TX0-TX4, TX_CLK, TX_CTL, RXD0-RXD4, RX_CLK & RX_CTL. > > > Not sure if you've seen this in the subthread that is ongoing with > > > Andrew Lunn but as part of it, I did invoke the mii-tool and got a > > > pretty printout of the PHY registers, see below: > > > > > > # mii-tool -vv eth0 > > > Using SIOCGMIIPHY=0x8947 > > > eth0: negotiated 100baseTx-FD, link ok > > > registers for MII PHY 0: > > > 1040 796d 0007 0572 01e1 45e1 0005 2801 > > > 0000 0300 4000 0000 0000 0000 0000 3000 > > > 9000 0000 0008 0000 0000 0000 3201 1000 > > > 0000 a020 0000 0000 802d 0021 0400 0000 > > Unfortunetly, I can't see anything obvious wrong with the registers. > > > > > product info: vendor 00:01:c1, model 23 rev 2 > > > basic mode: autonegotiation enabled > > > basic status: autonegotiation complete, link ok > > > capabilities: 1000baseT-HD 1000baseT-FD 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD > > > 10baseT-FD 10baseT-HD > > > advertising: 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD 10baseT-FD 10baseT-HD > > Are you expecting to run at 100Mbit? > that's right and expected. > > > link partner: 1000baseT-HD 1000baseT-FD 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD > > > 10baseT-FD 10baseT-HD flow-control > > > > > > Alternartively, the registers can be read with phytool also: > > > > > > # phytool read eth0/0/0x10 > > > 0x9000 > > > # phytool read eth0/0/0x11 > > > 0000 > > Another thing that you can try, is to put a probe and see if you > > actually see the TXCLK? And if I understand correctly that should be at > > 25MHz (because the link speed is 100Mbit). > Ah, that's a problem: > I did probe and the clock I probe is at 2.5MHz, not 25. That is one step foward :) > > Just to try out, I also temporarily connected it to 1000baseT: > > # mii-tool -vv eth0 > Using SIOCGMIIPHY=0x8947 > eth0: negotiated 1000baseT-FD flow-control, link ok > registers for MII PHY 0: > 1040 796d 0007 0572 01e1 c1e1 000d 2001 > 4d47 0300 3800 0000 0000 0000 0000 3000 > 0000 9000 0008 0000 0000 0000 3201 1000 > 0000 a020 a000 0000 a035 0021 0400 0000 > product info: vendor 00:01:c1, model 23 rev 2 > basic mode: autonegotiation enabled > basic status: autonegotiation complete, link ok > capabilities: 1000baseT-HD 1000baseT-FD 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD > 10baseT-FD 10baseT-HD > advertising: 1000baseT-FD 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD 10baseT-FD > 10baseT-HD > link partner: 1000baseT-HD 1000baseT-FD 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD > 10baseT-FD 10baseT-HD > > and even here, the TX_CLK remained at 2.5MHz (mind the scope I'm using > only goes up to 70MHz but I surely would not expect it to show me a > clear clock at 2.5MHz for a faster frequency). Then in theory if you force the speed to be 10Mbit, will it work? > > It appears to be "stuck" at 10MBit speed. Also it is at 2.5V instead of > 1.8V. > > Would I be able to configure this through device tree setting? I am not sure, if this is possible, shouldn't be a configuration option on the MAC side? As if I understand correctly, the MAC should generate the TX_CLK in RGMII regardless of the speed. I would prefer to leave this to people who have more knowledge then me to answer to this. > > Thanks Horatiu, > > this definitely showed clearly where there is a problem. > > -- > > Ron > -- /Horatiu