From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3304A7C for ; Thu, 4 May 2023 02:55:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 79E26C433EF; Thu, 4 May 2023 02:55:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1683168910; bh=FylaWKz62wVaqtqGNNjP+df9sVg09nj91zoWC6rJvqU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ajCZtdlFVdqv+//MJVJtJ7MrxdgTq0OR77nmRNLzm9OT6a4yJwB5Jqfmg5hRI+y+X uP36n5RzrR29G7GkMze1wSGWpxa09eqYPVHR5OTEVGT1VhB2gOZOlytgrVWSvrrU2P LyQBG6P37/sitiKcuSsNaJ4aG4LxereI0KrhltnGLr8fxKZ6sT6UYbEgZrdGRaC0YF 9wigyRWVqJX8BVoRvTdpg89dVpkG0hBYZMFNWTqditZyeYfMSZaRThuJb+ayOisVq2 RIVmhsx/sIj1U03fE7Lv0ky+C38Fl2YLlOygWGyqn7J//MoX6pJBCvHIg/sSUnqLHG totYkyYaMGIUg== Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 19:55:09 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Jon Maloy , Xin Long Cc: Tung Quang Nguyen , network dev , "tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net" , "davem@davemloft.net" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net 2/3] tipc: do not update mtu if msg_max is too small in mtu negotiation Message-ID: <20230503195509.1d637de6@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <0d328807d5087d0b6d03c3d2e5f355cd44ed576a.1683065352.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 3 May 2023 15:29:07 -0400 Jon Maloy wrote: > > I think it's correct to NOT use ''---' for version changes, see the > > comment from davem: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20160415.172858.253625178036493951.davem@davemloft.net/ > > > > unless there are some new rules I missed. > I have not seen this one before, and I disagree with David here. Many of > the changes > between versions are trivial, and some comments even incomprehensible > once the patch has > been applied. > I have always put them after the "---" comment, and I will continue to > do so until David starts > rejecting such patches. > > But ok, do as you find right. Yes, I think the motivation has changed a bit since we now have the permanent lore archive and we add links when applying patches. The change log is easy to find on lore, even after the --- delimiter.