From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: tariqt@nvidia.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC / RFT net 7/7] tls: rx: strp: don't use GFP_KERNEL in softirq context
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 18:20:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230511012034.902782-8-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230511012034.902782-1-kuba@kernel.org>
When receive buffer is small, or the TCP rx queue looks too
complicated to bother using it directly - we allocate a new
skb and copy data into it.
We already use sk->sk_allocation... but nothing actually
sets it to GFP_ATOMIC on the ->sk_data_ready() path.
Users of HW offload are far more likely to experience problems
due to scheduling while atomic. "Copy mode" is very rarely
triggered with SW crypto.
Fixes: 84c61fe1a75b ("tls: rx: do not use the standard strparser")
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
net/tls/tls_sw.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
index 635b8bf6b937..6e6a7c37d685 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
@@ -2304,10 +2304,14 @@ static void tls_data_ready(struct sock *sk)
struct tls_context *tls_ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
struct tls_sw_context_rx *ctx = tls_sw_ctx_rx(tls_ctx);
struct sk_psock *psock;
+ gfp_t alloc_save;
trace_sk_data_ready(sk);
+ alloc_save = sk->sk_allocation;
+ sk->sk_allocation = GFP_ATOMIC;
tls_strp_data_ready(&ctx->strp);
+ sk->sk_allocation = alloc_save;
psock = sk_psock_get(sk);
if (psock) {
--
2.40.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-11 1:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-11 1:20 [RFC / RFT net 0/7] tls: rx: strp: fix inline crypto offload Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-11 1:20 ` [RFC / RFT net 1/7] tls: rx: device: fix checking decryption status Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-11 1:20 ` [RFC / RFT net 2/7] tls: rx: strp: set the skb->len of detached / CoW'ed skbs Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-11 13:45 ` Simon Horman
2023-05-11 1:20 ` [RFC / RFT net 3/7] tls: rx: strp: force mixed decrypted records into copy mode Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-11 1:20 ` [RFC / RFT net 4/7] tls: rx: strp: fix determining record length in " Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-11 1:20 ` [RFC / RFT net 5/7] tls: rx: strp: factor out copying skb data Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-11 1:20 ` [RFC / RFT net 6/7] tls: rx: strp: preserve decryption status of skbs when needed Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-11 1:20 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-05-11 10:17 ` [RFC / RFT net 0/7] tls: rx: strp: fix inline crypto offload Tariq Toukan
2023-05-16 12:27 ` Tariq Toukan
2023-05-17 1:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230511012034.902782-8-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).