netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
	wuych <yunchuan@nfschina.com>,
	dchickles@marvell.com, sburla@marvell.com, fmanlunas@marvell.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: liquidio: lio_core: Remove unnecessary (void*) conversions
Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 20:20:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230516202059.09aab4d0@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZGKT01kLOQNRqx9I@corigine.com>

On Mon, 15 May 2023 22:19:31 +0200 Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 05:56:21PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 12:28:19PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:  
> > > Networking code needs to be in Reverse Christmas Tree order.  Longest
> > > lines first.  This code wasn't really in Reverse Christmas Tree order
> > > to begine with but now it's more obvious.  
> > 
> > Oh, duh.  This obviously can't be reversed because it depends on the
> > first declaration.  Sorry for the noise.  
> 
> FWIIW, I think the preferred approach for such cases is to
> separate the declaration and initialisation. Something like:
> 
> 	struct octeon_device *oct = droq->oct_dev;
> 	struct octeon_device_priv *oct_priv;
> 
> 	oct_priv = oct->priv;

I don't think these changes are worth bothering with at all, TBH.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-17  3:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-15  8:49 [PATCH net-next] net: liquidio: lio_core: Remove unnecessary (void*) conversions wuych
2023-05-15  9:28 ` Dan Carpenter
2023-05-15 14:56   ` Dan Carpenter
2023-05-15 20:19     ` Simon Horman
2023-05-17  3:20       ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-05-17  9:35         ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230516202059.09aab4d0@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dchickles@marvell.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fmanlunas@marvell.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sburla@marvell.com \
    --cc=simon.horman@corigine.com \
    --cc=yunchuan@nfschina.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).