From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AFEF17E0 for ; Wed, 17 May 2023 03:43:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8EF9FC4339B; Wed, 17 May 2023 03:43:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1684295012; bh=CJLZ9WG82ZCCQiQbLCmrLAxhuqRoqcXOdpEago8o7qI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=HPlmQmSpJmKanQGBKHF6no2TOxgwxkIsWVhlpF0nXhUvxD/7kO7YvVFlXW0gHwFgh E9NFOpZlzYj5jVp1NuDH47L4i3F4MKiwvtE9YxP9FBoiqMZji/LMDLLu3kP+a4H8bG XZB26s8VfJehSYu8ZnJPD9WLy4I8vZczhPQJZ3HSpRYBmt1rg0lt2DZ6Fw11qGTG7h 84LAs5Zt63rPHCgjTvrjXWtw8RDLSvljz8ug2W1eHvkjq4zy9jN+F5oBUu9bjaImBW 8Vakoy7D6dSXAyCgdijlU/sica3lKFIz0DuqD1sGXuLf1AyXk3XWDw74S74VB8zxqC UaA5Bz6aGY7QQ== Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 20:43:30 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Angus Chen Cc: davem@davemloft.net, dsahern@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, idosch@idosch.org, petrm@nvidia.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net: Remove low_thresh in ip defrag Message-ID: <20230516204330.1443bc7c@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20230517001820.1625-1-angus.chen@jaguarmicro.com> References: <20230517001820.1625-1-angus.chen@jaguarmicro.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 17 May 2023 08:18:20 +0800 Angus Chen wrote: > As low_thresh has no work in fragment reassembles,mark it to be unused. > And Mark it deprecated in sysctl Document. > > Signed-off-by: Angus Chen We need to revert the old patch first, we can't remove the commit from the git history because it would change all later hashes and break rebasing. Why are you renaming the member? Just add the comment and update the documentation. You said you had a tested complaint, the tester will only read the docs, right? -- pw-bot: cr