From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Andrea Claudi <aclaudi@redhat.com>
Cc: Vladimir Nikishkin <vladimir@nikishkin.pw>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
eng.alaamohamedsoliman.am@gmail.com, gnault@redhat.com,
razor@blackwall.org, idosch@nvidia.com, liuhangbin@gmail.com,
eyal.birger@gmail.com, jtoppins@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next v6] ip-link: add support for nolocalbypass in vxlan
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 15:23:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230523152317.4cd1b838@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZG0H0OYaKlni3Je9@renaissance-vector>
On Tue, 23 May 2023 20:37:04 +0200
Andrea Claudi <aclaudi@redhat.com> wrote:
> Stephen, I'll try to summarize the discussion we had in v5 here.
>
> - We agree that it's a good idea to have JSON attributes printed both
> when 'true' and 'false'. As Petr said, this makes the code less error
> prone and makes it clear attribute is supported.
> - I have some concerns about printing options only when non-default
> values are set. Non-JSON output is mostly consumed by humans, that
> usually expects something to be visible if present/true/enabled. I
> know I'm advocating for a change in the iproute output here, and we
> usually don't do that, but I argue there's value in having a less
> cluttered and confusing output.
>
> For example, let's take what you see with a default vxlan:
> $ ip link add type vxlan id 12
> $ ip -j link show vxlan0
> [...] udpcsum noudp6zerocsumtx noudp6zerocsumrx [...]
>
> IMHO printing only "udpcsum" is enough to make the user aware that
> the "udpcsum" feature is enabled and the rest is off.
>
> I'm not against Vladimir's change, of course. But I would be very happy
> if we can agree on a direction for the output from now on, and try to
> enforce it, maybe deprecating the "old way" to print out stuff step by
> step, if we find it useful.
>
> What do you think?
> Andrea
If you look at the other RFC patch set. It does change to always
print the state of all options.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-23 22:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-23 4:48 [PATCH iproute2-next v6] ip-link: add support for nolocalbypass in vxlan Vladimir Nikishkin
2023-05-23 16:04 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-05-23 16:11 ` Vladimir Nikishkin
2023-05-23 18:37 ` Andrea Claudi
2023-05-23 22:23 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2023-05-25 8:08 ` Vladimir Nikishkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230523152317.4cd1b838@hermes.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=aclaudi@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eng.alaamohamedsoliman.am@gmail.com \
--cc=eyal.birger@gmail.com \
--cc=gnault@redhat.com \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=jtoppins@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=vladimir@nikishkin.pw \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).