From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>, Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] lib/libnetlink: ensure a minimum of 32KB for the buffer used in rtnl_recvmsg()
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 14:51:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230531145148.2cb3cbe8@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7517ba8c-2f51-6ced-ba84-e349f5db8cac@nvidia.com>
On Mon, 29 May 2023 15:29:51 +0300
Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com> wrote:
> On 13/02/2019 4:04, David Ahern wrote:
> > On 2/12/19 6:58 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >> In the past, we tried to increase the buffer size up to 32 KB in order
> >> to reduce number of syscalls per dump.
> >>
> >> Commit 2d34851cd341 ("lib/libnetlink: re malloc buff if size is not enough")
> >> brought the size back to 4KB because the kernel can not know the application
> >> is ready to receive bigger requests.
> >>
> >> See kernel commits 9063e21fb026 ("netlink: autosize skb lengthes") and
> >> d35c99ff77ec ("netlink: do not enter direct reclaim from netlink_dump()")
> >> for more details.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 2d34851cd341 ("lib/libnetlink: re malloc buff if size is not enough")
> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> >> Cc: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
> >> Cc: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
> >> ---
> >> lib/libnetlink.c | 2 ++
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/lib/libnetlink.c b/lib/libnetlink.c
> >> index 1892a02ab5d0d73776c9882ffc77edcd2c663d01..0d48a3d43cf03065dacbd419578ab10af56431a4 100644
> >> --- a/lib/libnetlink.c
> >> +++ b/lib/libnetlink.c
> >> @@ -718,6 +718,8 @@ static int rtnl_recvmsg(int fd, struct msghdr *msg, char **answer)
> >> if (len < 0)
> >> return len;
> >>
> >> + if (len < 32768)
> >> + len = 32768;
> >> buf = malloc(len);
> >> if (!buf) {
> >> fprintf(stderr, "malloc error: not enough buffer\n");
> >>
> >
> > I believe that negates the whole point of 2d34851cd341 - which I have no
> > problem with. 2 recvmsg calls per message is overkill.
> >
> > Do we know of any single message sizes > 32k? 2d34851cd341 cites
> > increasing VF's but at some point there is a limit. If not, the whole
> > PEEK thing should go away and we just malloc 32k (or 64k) buffers for
> > each recvmsg.
> >
>
> Hey,
>
> Sorry for reviving this old thread, but I see this topic was already
> discussed here :).
> I have a system where the large number of VFs result in a message
> greater than 32k, which makes a simple 'ip link' command return an error.
>
> Should we change the kernel's 'max_recvmsg_len' to 64k? Any other (more
> robust) ideas to resolve this issue?
No matter what the size, someone will always have too many VF's to fit
in the response. There is no way to get a stable solution without doing
some API changes.
It is possible to dump millions of routes, so it is not directly a netlink
issue more that the current API is slamming all the VF's as info blocks
under a single message response.
That would mean replacing IFLA_VFINFO_LIST with a separate query
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-31 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-13 1:58 [PATCH iproute2] lib/libnetlink: ensure a minimum of 32KB for the buffer used in rtnl_recvmsg() Eric Dumazet
2019-02-13 2:04 ` David Ahern
2019-02-13 2:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2019-02-13 6:20 ` Hangbin Liu
2019-02-14 13:51 ` Michal Kubecek
2019-02-14 13:49 ` Michal Kubecek
2019-02-14 17:34 ` David Ahern
2019-02-14 17:47 ` Phil Sutter
2023-05-29 12:29 ` Gal Pressman
2023-05-31 21:51 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2023-06-04 13:33 ` Gal Pressman
2023-06-04 16:03 ` David Ahern
2023-06-05 7:24 ` Gal Pressman
2019-02-13 17:46 ` Phil Sutter
2019-02-13 17:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2019-02-13 21:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-02-13 21:59 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230531145148.2cb3cbe8@hermes.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phil@nwl.cc \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).