From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACD225250 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2023 08:33:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ej1-x634.google.com (mail-ej1-x634.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::634]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75C4E10E9; Thu, 1 Jun 2023 01:32:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x634.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-96f5685f902so67818366b.2; Thu, 01 Jun 2023 01:32:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1685608369; x=1688200369; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=SGeZcj/xqFdBCAsFRsR5LjFS8WiTXlKQmU3ozKW5lR0=; b=mXU+LX1Wxnt6lmvGgkf7+2noyrxmQpFer4WKZxeN/tx7ikKz/G6AgGOIAokKOIJxIp VF7jwBKqZQNlgyRIc50qizrWT5M7wzM+RvEL1r1lOVTzQ0TtG2BzIBHjTJCMIhwSEKl4 tN32MBRJvSmNGj8BhsJiOZTcaDFFcrXbCB0iH2nxcOU5FHuCCCwTXL+31AI1cK7IUtnC x+kg/RjRjnkCDKRHVgzW9QEhOlVFKzySFCuTLjg19WXPnExT+qy52g4oVp9RJZWHe5qj +62Is6FZMt6/fHZ9XMqRoW7toH7111CGjgtPJ3QrMjsBvWjHh0lYUxQwyADa7HVjc64o wC6Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1685608369; x=1688200369; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=SGeZcj/xqFdBCAsFRsR5LjFS8WiTXlKQmU3ozKW5lR0=; b=Jf3vDRUCsAb6qWJkmwsDk2dVQljoJd+Us2Vz8EL2U2CEl1ABR4pWs/hrl4M8gVDEGw PKRbjqIq8ASpCyTU1GQPWVlO7CxNbBD+XGDSIfvJmfU0pGGmNXFli8m+VfFlozPDrDWV kwVXIarbYRhyOlHcggbe+MGsfrgQW+U/kU7kObnmba4UMANMORWerhPRffx7Bqgm5fpo JrRbPtQz/i5XeZ2kt1SnUHiUXI4TqSVy+yuHUmh/zPlVRhu4GoVSZ1c9bvFuQYTcDbpU qzOljsxHQ6i04Dg6xXEZmfWpk4YJXz2GZyzoSisH+LYRfHQlB9OZOX88FReUEOxbY7yW /0xg== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwqQbguCKveVBWI9AcvgoDbf+Lby7S3COLlq8JHGu4QIkSlblb3 xBajS/IkwnS9VobAKFurJc6eUHPAQhpp0A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ7lWbhSWAvgjHtzXmXkJka4X6rAwGfYs04sUm+XtpQRB4f/nLQx2GdQ2dSelz67MmLr5qBGtg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:9406:b0:94a:845c:3529 with SMTP id dk6-20020a170907940600b0094a845c3529mr7095765ejc.9.1685608368467; Thu, 01 Jun 2023 01:32:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from skbuf ([188.27.184.189]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a17-20020a17090680d100b0096739e10659sm10215611ejx.163.2023.06.01.01.32.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 01 Jun 2023 01:32:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 11:32:46 +0300 From: Vladimir Oltean To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: "Sverdlin, Alexander" , "privat@egil-hjelmeland.no" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "f.fainelli@gmail.com" , "andrew@lunn.ch" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: dsa: lan9303: allow vid != 0 in port_fdb_{add|del} methods Message-ID: <20230601083246.3ll6b5l7pqoazbir@skbuf> References: <20230531143826.477267-1-alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com> <20230531151620.rqdaf2dlp5jsn6mk@skbuf> <426c54cdaa001d55cdcacee4ae9e7712cee617c2.camel@siemens.com> <20230531153519.t3go47caebkchltv@skbuf> <20230531214150.2e0f03d1@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230531214150.2e0f03d1@kernel.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 09:41:50PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Wed, 31 May 2023 18:35:19 +0300 Vladimir Oltean wrote: > > If you want to be completely sure I didn't just throw a wrench into > > your plans, feel free to resend a v2 with just my review tag > > (dropping my Fixes tag) > > FWIW if you worry that the Fixes tag will get added automatically - > for whatever reason that still doesn't work. We add them manually > when someone provides a tag in response. Aha, ok. So as long as the maintainer who applies the patch does not append the second Fixes: tag that I had proposed, all is well and this change can be applied as is.