From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
s.shtylyov@omp.ru, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: renesas: rswitch: Fix return value in error path of xmit
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 09:10:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230601091012.5633540f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7d84293de72a05c76d66f9010248f4d233cd1c1a.camel@redhat.com>
On Thu, 01 Jun 2023 10:41:34 +0200 Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > I agree that this is the correct return value for this case.
> > But I do wonder if, as per the documentation of ndo_start_xmit,
> > something should be done to avoid getting into such a situation.
> >
> > * netdev_tx_t (*ndo_start_xmit)(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > * struct net_device *dev);
> > * Called when a packet needs to be transmitted.
> > * Returns NETDEV_TX_OK. Can return NETDEV_TX_BUSY, but you should stop
> > * the queue before that can happen; it's for obsolete devices and weird
> > * corner cases, but the stack really does a non-trivial amount
> > * of useless work if you return NETDEV_TX_BUSY.
> > * Required; cannot be NULL.
>
> I agree with Simon, it looks like the driver usage of
> netif_stop_subqueue()/netif_wake_subqueue() is a dubious.
>
> I think you will be better of using
> netif_subqueue_maybe_stop()/netif_subqueue_completed_wake() alike what
> rtl8169 is doing. e.g. netif_subqueue_maybe_stop() should be invoked
> after the tx buffer enqueue, and netif_subqueue_completed_wake() should
> be invoked after successful tx ring cleanup.
That's a separate issue, tho, right? The cleanup is lockless and our
magic lockless macro scheme does not protect from spurious wakeups.
So they still need to check if the queue is full at the top of xmit.
And they still need to return the correct error in that case..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-01 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-29 7:38 [PATCH net] net: renesas: rswitch: Fix return value in error path of xmit Yoshihiro Shimoda
2023-05-30 11:42 ` Simon Horman
2023-06-01 8:41 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-06-01 16:10 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-06-01 16:26 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-06-01 17:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230601091012.5633540f@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=s.shtylyov@omp.ru \
--cc=simon.horman@corigine.com \
--cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).