netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Anjali Kulkarni <anjali.k.kulkarni@oracle.com>
Cc: "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	"johannes@sipsolutions.net" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	"ecree.xilinx@gmail.com" <ecree.xilinx@gmail.com>,
	"leon@kernel.org" <leon@kernel.org>,
	"keescook@chromium.org" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"socketcan@hartkopp.net" <socketcan@hartkopp.net>,
	"petrm@nvidia.com" <petrm@nvidia.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] connector/cn_proc: Performance improvements
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 09:48:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230601094827.60bd8db1@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B9B5E492-36A1-4ED5-97ED-1ED048F51FCF@oracle.com>

On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 16:38:04 +0000 Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
> > The #define FILTER and ifdefs around it need to go, this much I can
> > tell you without understanding what it does :S We have the git history
> > we don't need to keep dead code around.  
> 
> The FILTER option is for backwards compatibility for those who may be
> using the proc connector today - so they do not need to immediately
> switch to using the new method - the example just shows the old
> method which does not break or need changes - do you still want me to
> remove the FILTER? 

Is it possible to recode the sample so the format can be decided based
on cmd line argument? To be honest samples are kinda dead, it'd be best
if the code was rewritten to act as a selftest.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-01 16:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-31 23:55 [PATCH v4 0/6] Process connector bug fixes & enhancements Anjali Kulkarni
2023-03-31 23:55 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] netlink: Reverse the patch which removed filtering Anjali Kulkarni
2023-04-01  4:08   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-04-01  4:09   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-04-01 18:24     ` Anjali Kulkarni
2023-04-01 19:12       ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-04-01 19:58         ` Anjali Kulkarni
2023-04-03 20:47           ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-04-02  2:32         ` Anjali Kulkarni
2023-04-03 20:50           ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-04-04 18:06             ` Anjali Kulkarni
2023-04-26 23:58             ` Anjali Kulkarni
2023-04-27 17:03               ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-11 16:04                 ` Anjali Kulkarni
2023-06-01 16:15                   ` Anjali Kulkarni
2023-06-01 16:24                     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-01 16:34                       ` Anjali Kulkarni
2023-06-01 16:43                         ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-01 16:49                           ` Anjali Kulkarni
2023-03-31 23:55 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] netlink: Add new netlink_release function Anjali Kulkarni
2023-04-01  4:08   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-31 23:55 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] connector/cn_proc: Add filtering to fix some bugs Anjali Kulkarni
2023-03-31 23:55 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] connector/cn_proc: Test code for proc connector Anjali Kulkarni
2023-03-31 23:55 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] connector/cn_proc: Performance improvements Anjali Kulkarni
2023-06-01 16:25   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-01 16:38     ` Anjali Kulkarni
2023-06-01 16:48       ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-06-01 16:53         ` Anjali Kulkarni
2023-06-01 17:15           ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-02 22:23             ` Anjali Kulkarni
2023-06-02 23:02               ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-31 23:55 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] connector/cn_proc: Allow non-root users access Anjali Kulkarni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230601094827.60bd8db1@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=anjali.k.kulkarni@oracle.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ecree.xilinx@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
    --cc=zbr@ioremap.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).