From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D6A0332E1; Fri, 2 Jun 2023 16:54:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77BABC433D2; Fri, 2 Jun 2023 16:54:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1685724848; bh=cn8PP+KjC0WdCEavBUy1xLwsTmD3K1c7Pp/44YdagUc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=MLYFWvjvPLphpN5Mb3iQJwqqIMW3Dm2kYlBVp41Lqw8WsAX2cMaz15LCUGAYUrfO8 dEl/ZeJ8RVHSiktRjhv531xztCw8MXvkribL1MhTA1BeWUVMGJQh+DrDWJQ88s5R/s FzTdeVacX2FN2l3W+NxvYwMjE504jwU5c9EHrT6DrAS5f0Lj8UQAtSdBS+g1+UmhLR M/9Hymur+J7mDh+QCGUl/WKTGzPKwjB5enIcpbdfXxUeqyeUbbwLYPHJdHZqFILDSH rpvL7Fa8sXCxdtMMEPeVKT+v7dmT98RsUDzG458g99hy6fLAaoeljHz8v0Spw48SXf XAwm/r7XfSyKA== Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 09:54:07 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Linux regressions mailing list , Chuck Lever III , "elic@nvidia.com" , "saeedm@nvidia.com" , Leon Romanovsky , linux-rdma , "open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]" Subject: Re: system hang on start-up (mlx5?) Message-ID: <20230602095407.109bdffc@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <5b235e0f-cd4c-a453-d648-5a4e9080ac19@leemhuis.info> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 11:29:24 -0300 Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > Also, checkpatch.pl is now complaining about Closes: tags instead > > > of Link: tags. A bug was never opened for this issue. > > > > That was a change by somebody else, but FWIW, just use Closes: (instead > > of Link:) with a link to the report on lore, that tag is not reserved > > for bugs. > > > > /me will go and update his boilerplate text used above > > And now you say they should be closes not link? > > Oy it makes my head hurt all these rules. +1 I don't understand why the Closes tag were accepted. I may be misremembering but I thought Linus wanted Link tags: Link: https://bla/bla optionally with a trailer: Link: https://bla/bla # closes The checkpatch warning is just adding an annoying amount of noise for all of use who don't use Closes tags.