From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B76546FA7 for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2023 06:18:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 629E2C433EF; Sat, 10 Jun 2023 06:18:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1686377925; bh=KPgD/9Glz7+iZJGMHKYZ1mmYqCqGiq+K6N4Gb83nmU4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=WfQA/qiwN1uY78SbVfP0pXYOw5bXZvDwqwyzVfboSQZbiZl0tmk8E/y8FT5EmvVMs F9laZGCQo2iY3O1qTj+IoL/woQBGKebAO2I3ZrX+r/pbvax59Us1GFfb8iMUxE5sNB L1SlxWyszSzsPrKaE+Zs3NxL9o01Cg0L9OoRoFAufQYowtk+fclGqD8zPXJVSds3Hr ayV+4d3cOmKBrxNlu1Aug5zApooRSDmAVd1tDEHj9YrEh7OG9onz6N+HT3tc658Eh/ ivqV9atz7ykJKM5D0f/886+1PddRHsJzU+ev2NjjSzwXdn7GSHcgx3aZ5n6NPFXiH6 oXdvy72MdEqoQ== Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 23:18:43 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Justin Chen Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, florian.fainelli@broadcom.com, "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Andrew Lunn , Daniil Tatianin , Ido Schimmel , Marco Bonelli , Wolfram Sang , Jiri Pirko , Gal Pressman , Vincent Mailhol , Kuniyuki Iwashima , open list Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] ethtool: ioctl: improve error checking for set_wol Message-ID: <20230609231843.6e5a18db@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <1686179653-29750-1-git-send-email-justin.chen@broadcom.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 9 Jun 2023 13:47:22 -0700 Justin Chen wrote: > Was thinking more about this patch. I realized we don't account for the > different sopass case. > # ethtool -s eth0 wol s sopass 11:22:33:44:55:66 > # ethtool -s eth0 wol s sopass 22:44:55:66:77:88 > > For this case, the second sopass values won't be stored. > > Can you drop this patch? I will submit another version. We can't drop patches, it'd mess up commit IDs and basing trees on top of net-next would be a major PITA for people. Please send a fix on top (with a Fixes tag making it clear that the problem has not reached any -rc kernel).