From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@kernel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>, Moshe Shemesh <moshe@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 14/15] net/mlx5: Light probe local SFs
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2023 00:01:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230610000123.04c3a32f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230610014254.343576-15-saeed@kernel.org>
On Fri, 9 Jun 2023 18:42:53 -0700 Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> In case user wants to configure the SFs, for example: to use only vdpa
> functionality, he needs to fully probe a SF, configure what he wants,
> and afterward reload the SF.
>
> In order to save the time of the reload, local SFs will probe without
> any auxiliary sub-device, so that the SFs can be configured prior to
> its full probe.
I feel like we talked about this at least twice already, and I keep
saying that the features should be specified when the device is
spawned. Am I misremembering?
Will this patch not surprise existing users? You're changing the
defaults. Does "local" mean on the IPU? Also "lightweight" feels
uncomfortably close to marketing language.
> The defaults of the enable_* devlink params of these SFs are set to
> false.
>
> Usage example:
Is this a real example? Because we have..
> Create SF:
> $ devlink port add pci/0000:08:00.0 flavour pcisf pfnum 0 sfnum 11
sfnum 11 here
> $ devlink port function set pci/0000:08:00.0/32768 \
then port is 32768
> hw_addr 00:00:00:00:00:11 state active
>
> Enable ETH auxiliary device:
> $ devlink dev param set auxiliary/mlx5_core.sf.1 \
and instance is sf.1
> name enable_eth value true cmode driverinit
>
> Now, in order to fully probe the SF, use devlink reload:
> $ devlink dev reload auxiliary/mlx5_core.sf.1
>
> At this point the user have SF devlink instance with auxiliary device
> for the Ethernet functionality only.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-10 7:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-10 1:42 [pull request][net-next 00/15] mlx5 updates 2023-06-09 Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-10 1:42 ` [net-next 01/15] net/mlx5: Simplify unload all rep code Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-12 11:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-06-10 1:42 ` [net-next 02/15] net/mlx5: mlx5_ifc updates for embedded CPU SRIOV Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-10 1:42 ` [net-next 03/15] net/mlx5: Enable devlink port for embedded cpu VF vports Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-10 1:42 ` [net-next 04/15] net/mlx5: Update vport caps query/set for EC VFs Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-10 1:42 ` [net-next 05/15] net/mlx5: Add management of EC VF vports Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-10 1:42 ` [net-next 06/15] net/mlx5: Add/remove peer miss rules for EC VFs Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-10 1:42 ` [net-next 07/15] net/mlx5: Add new page type for EC VF pages Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-10 1:42 ` [net-next 08/15] net/mlx5: Use correct vport when restoring GUIDs Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-10 1:42 ` [net-next 09/15] net/mlx5: Query correct caps for min msix vectors Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-10 1:42 ` [net-next 10/15] net/mlx5: Update SRIOV enable/disable to handle EC/VFs Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-10 1:42 ` [net-next 11/15] net/mlx5: Set max number of embedded CPU VFs Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-10 1:42 ` [net-next 12/15] net/mlx5: Split function_setup() to enable and open functions Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-10 1:42 ` [net-next 13/15] net/mlx5: Move esw multiport devlink param to eswitch code Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-10 1:42 ` [net-next 14/15] net/mlx5: Light probe local SFs Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-10 7:01 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-06-11 4:15 ` Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-11 5:10 ` Samudrala, Sridhar
2023-06-13 23:41 ` Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-12 17:51 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-13 23:32 ` Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-14 2:05 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-15 10:51 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-06-15 16:37 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-15 17:37 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-06-15 19:33 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-21 13:14 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-06-21 18:23 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-22 6:42 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-06-22 6:38 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-06-22 16:35 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-23 9:27 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-06-23 15:21 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-24 9:33 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-06-24 20:47 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-27 10:12 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-06-27 15:24 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-27 17:16 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-06-27 17:35 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-10 1:42 ` [net-next 15/15] net/mlx5e: Remove a useless function call Saeed Mahameed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230610000123.04c3a32f@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=moshe@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=saeed@kernel.org \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=shayd@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).