From: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@kernel.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
Daniel Jurgens <danielj@nvidia.com>, William Tu <witu@nvidia.com>,
Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
Subject: [net-next 01/15] net/mlx5: Simplify unload all rep code
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 18:42:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230610014254.343576-2-saeed@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230610014254.343576-1-saeed@kernel.org>
From: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@nvidia.com>
Instead of using type specific iterators which are only used in one place
just traverse the xarray. It will provide suitable ordering based on the
vport numbers. This will also eliminate the need for changes here when
new types are added.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: William Tu <witu@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
---
.../mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c | 48 +------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 47 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
index eafb098db6b0..625982454575 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
@@ -55,13 +55,6 @@
#define mlx5_esw_for_each_rep(esw, i, rep) \
xa_for_each(&((esw)->offloads.vport_reps), i, rep)
-#define mlx5_esw_for_each_sf_rep(esw, i, rep) \
- xa_for_each_marked(&((esw)->offloads.vport_reps), i, rep, MLX5_ESW_VPT_SF)
-
-#define mlx5_esw_for_each_vf_rep(esw, index, rep) \
- mlx5_esw_for_each_entry_marked(&((esw)->offloads.vport_reps), index, \
- rep, (esw)->esw_funcs.num_vfs, MLX5_ESW_VPT_VF)
-
/* There are two match-all miss flows, one for unicast dst mac and
* one for multicast.
*/
@@ -2191,18 +2184,6 @@ static int esw_offloads_start(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
return 0;
}
-static void mlx5_esw_offloads_rep_mark_set(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
- struct mlx5_eswitch_rep *rep,
- xa_mark_t mark)
-{
- bool mark_set;
-
- /* Copy the mark from vport to its rep */
- mark_set = xa_get_mark(&esw->vports, rep->vport, mark);
- if (mark_set)
- xa_set_mark(&esw->offloads.vport_reps, rep->vport, mark);
-}
-
static int mlx5_esw_offloads_rep_init(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, const struct mlx5_vport *vport)
{
struct mlx5_eswitch_rep *rep;
@@ -2222,9 +2203,6 @@ static int mlx5_esw_offloads_rep_init(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, const struct mlx
if (err)
goto insert_err;
- mlx5_esw_offloads_rep_mark_set(esw, rep, MLX5_ESW_VPT_HOST_FN);
- mlx5_esw_offloads_rep_mark_set(esw, rep, MLX5_ESW_VPT_VF);
- mlx5_esw_offloads_rep_mark_set(esw, rep, MLX5_ESW_VPT_SF);
return 0;
insert_err:
@@ -2365,37 +2343,13 @@ static void __esw_offloads_unload_rep(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
esw->offloads.rep_ops[rep_type]->unload(rep);
}
-static void __unload_reps_sf_vport(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, u8 rep_type)
-{
- struct mlx5_eswitch_rep *rep;
- unsigned long i;
-
- mlx5_esw_for_each_sf_rep(esw, i, rep)
- __esw_offloads_unload_rep(esw, rep, rep_type);
-}
-
static void __unload_reps_all_vport(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, u8 rep_type)
{
struct mlx5_eswitch_rep *rep;
unsigned long i;
- __unload_reps_sf_vport(esw, rep_type);
-
- mlx5_esw_for_each_vf_rep(esw, i, rep)
- __esw_offloads_unload_rep(esw, rep, rep_type);
-
- if (mlx5_ecpf_vport_exists(esw->dev)) {
- rep = mlx5_eswitch_get_rep(esw, MLX5_VPORT_ECPF);
- __esw_offloads_unload_rep(esw, rep, rep_type);
- }
-
- if (mlx5_core_is_ecpf_esw_manager(esw->dev)) {
- rep = mlx5_eswitch_get_rep(esw, MLX5_VPORT_PF);
+ mlx5_esw_for_each_rep(esw, i, rep)
__esw_offloads_unload_rep(esw, rep, rep_type);
- }
-
- rep = mlx5_eswitch_get_rep(esw, MLX5_VPORT_UPLINK);
- __esw_offloads_unload_rep(esw, rep, rep_type);
}
int mlx5_esw_offloads_rep_load(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, u16 vport_num)
--
2.40.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-10 1:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-10 1:42 [pull request][net-next 00/15] mlx5 updates 2023-06-09 Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-10 1:42 ` Saeed Mahameed [this message]
2023-06-12 11:00 ` [net-next 01/15] net/mlx5: Simplify unload all rep code patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-06-10 1:42 ` [net-next 02/15] net/mlx5: mlx5_ifc updates for embedded CPU SRIOV Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-10 1:42 ` [net-next 03/15] net/mlx5: Enable devlink port for embedded cpu VF vports Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-10 1:42 ` [net-next 04/15] net/mlx5: Update vport caps query/set for EC VFs Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-10 1:42 ` [net-next 05/15] net/mlx5: Add management of EC VF vports Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-10 1:42 ` [net-next 06/15] net/mlx5: Add/remove peer miss rules for EC VFs Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-10 1:42 ` [net-next 07/15] net/mlx5: Add new page type for EC VF pages Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-10 1:42 ` [net-next 08/15] net/mlx5: Use correct vport when restoring GUIDs Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-10 1:42 ` [net-next 09/15] net/mlx5: Query correct caps for min msix vectors Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-10 1:42 ` [net-next 10/15] net/mlx5: Update SRIOV enable/disable to handle EC/VFs Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-10 1:42 ` [net-next 11/15] net/mlx5: Set max number of embedded CPU VFs Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-10 1:42 ` [net-next 12/15] net/mlx5: Split function_setup() to enable and open functions Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-10 1:42 ` [net-next 13/15] net/mlx5: Move esw multiport devlink param to eswitch code Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-10 1:42 ` [net-next 14/15] net/mlx5: Light probe local SFs Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-10 7:01 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-11 4:15 ` Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-11 5:10 ` Samudrala, Sridhar
2023-06-13 23:41 ` Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-12 17:51 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-13 23:32 ` Saeed Mahameed
2023-06-14 2:05 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-15 10:51 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-06-15 16:37 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-15 17:37 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-06-15 19:33 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-21 13:14 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-06-21 18:23 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-22 6:42 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-06-22 6:38 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-06-22 16:35 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-23 9:27 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-06-23 15:21 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-24 9:33 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-06-24 20:47 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-27 10:12 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-06-27 15:24 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-27 17:16 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-06-27 17:35 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-10 1:42 ` [net-next 15/15] net/mlx5e: Remove a useless function call Saeed Mahameed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230610014254.343576-2-saeed@kernel.org \
--to=saeed@kernel.org \
--cc=danielj@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
--cc=witu@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).