From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 423491B914; Fri, 16 Jun 2023 19:23:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7179EC433C9; Fri, 16 Jun 2023 19:23:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1686943405; bh=cnIqbuBX2ydMik110zH5Tr4xSps2iWYs5dGlM7iEC3c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=dfcPsEtoNltFBIdLiIzd92IOTx9MkDLZr2M/KPNy9MDUeUHxxSBzG+ACApIAyLoH+ n1PQEF/qlmFULl2i9Sil96YoHUEMePOHPWYeFTICx+Kw43nDOqliMMQcERtoskgHlz mgEMfs6phCtbYWGyKWFhTfnIRFwNnBihLbr+d7kSCOu+trVsZMwxdeveL9NDnN/11z MhEG5vDSNQmOWBjN8ocvT9ZhqCS2E/+HeJj7OAm/81f98aL3cWUrTTzRRNjhncvFvM 8pvjx2dRLpfcufBgvcOsUw9mlOcQnRgRXz32Ysr4xWL4NSw4cD3oxcmQuePuZsGdf4 yglAMf9sVzBug== Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 12:23:24 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Saeed Mahameed Cc: Maxim Mikityanskiy , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Gal Pressman , Tariq Toukan , bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/2] xdp_rxq_info_reg fixes for mlx5e Message-ID: <20230616122324.3ddff8c3@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20230614090006.594909-1-maxtram95@gmail.com> <20230615223250.422eb67a@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 11:54:21 -0700 Saeed Mahameed wrote: > On 15 Jun 22:32, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > >On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 12:00:04 +0300 Maxim Mikityanskiy wrote: > >> Marked for net-next, as I'm not sure what the consensus was, but they > >> can be applied cleanly to net as well. > > > >Sorry for lack of clarity, you should drop the fixes tags. > >If not implementing something was a bug most of the patches we merge > >would have a fixes tag. That devalues the Fixes tag completely. > >You can still ask Greg/Sasha to backport it later if you want. > > You don't think this should go to net ? > > The first 3 version were targeting net branch .. I don't know why Maxim > decided to switch v4 to net-next, Maybe I missed an email ? > > IMHO, I think these are net worthy since they are fixing > issues with blabla, for commits claiming to add support for blabla. > > I already applied those earlier to my net queue and was working on > submission today, let me know if you are ok for me to send those two > patches in my today's net PR. If you already have them queued up for net, that's fine.