netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>,
	linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v4 0/3] leds: trigger: netdev: add additional modes
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 11:26:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230620102629.GD1472962@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dd82d1bd-a225-4452-a9a6-fb447bdb070e@lunn.ch>

On Mon, 19 Jun 2023, Andrew Lunn wrote:

> > Seeing as we're on -rc7 already, any reason why we shouldn't hold off
> > and simply apply these against LEDs once v6.5 is released?
> 
> Each subsystem has its own policies. netdev tends to accept patches
> right up until the merge window opens, sometimes even a couple of days
> into the merge window for low risk changes. Maybe this is because
> netdev is fast moving, two weeks of not merging results in a big
> backlog of patches, making it a bumpy restart once merging is started
> again. And is some of those late patches breaks something, there is
> still 7 weeks to fix it.
> 
> Since this is cross subsystems i would expect both subsystems
> Maintainers to agree to a merge or not. If you want to be more
> conservative than netdev, wait until after the next merge window,
> please say so.
> 
> If you do decided to wait, you are going to need to create another
> stable branch to pull into netdev. I know it is not a huge overhead,
> but it is still work, coordination etc.

Can you clarify you last point for me please?

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-20 10:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-17 11:53 [net-next PATCH v4 0/3] leds: trigger: netdev: add additional modes Christian Marangi
2023-06-17 11:53 ` [net-next PATCH v4 1/3] leds: trigger: netdev: add additional specific link speed mode Christian Marangi
2023-06-17 11:53 ` [net-next PATCH v4 2/3] leds: trigger: netdev: add additional specific link duplex mode Christian Marangi
2023-06-18 20:10   ` Andrew Lunn
2023-06-17 11:53 ` [net-next PATCH v4 3/3] leds: trigger: netdev: expose hw_control status via sysfs Christian Marangi
2023-06-18 20:15   ` Andrew Lunn
2023-06-19 10:40 ` [net-next PATCH v4 0/3] leds: trigger: netdev: add additional modes Lee Jones
2023-06-19 13:34   ` Andrew Lunn
2023-06-20 10:26     ` Lee Jones [this message]
2023-06-20 13:59       ` Andrew Lunn
2023-06-21 14:56         ` Lee Jones
2023-06-19 20:27 ` Simon Horman
2023-06-19 20:48   ` Christian Marangi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230620102629.GD1472962@google.com \
    --to=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).