From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47E2919E79 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 19:28:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3CD91C433C8; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 19:28:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1687375734; bh=nNBZ1I8BebsDYcdo4l7gDQ1Hn5OE9c3uSHYzb0t+3XM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=R26wgOabmp0CRa8IiCF15kmDjYhyerIX9rlcS/KGWpf7JjbqM40DHh3XglerBXTfD lcsdb1F155VAC3lXamnR3ncSMK3wj4Qtkqn3oT1iJ1fkvTjO0OAhexosC/Q/cmGXc6 ODs4ADET9NYu8g7pn9WVrTfiGzZhhQy1IN+YgtGXwvVOWuGdjVnudMvaLtjHGODjUZ u3HnC5OGYrqjZJqryvo2nhdpHiRjkZ6dfbapVCGwvynTIxoo8L78vt31n5DlJ34BYe DnzwovjtI825qZbacdpwqmBNfzHQ1D1VAHviUSp2hisebzz6xAaZu4eNr6xlzG5gCk UaSEvSt+ipjlw== Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 12:28:53 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: "Linga, Pavan Kumar" Cc: Tony Nguyen , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 00/15][pull request] Introduce Intel IDPF driver Message-ID: <20230621122853.08d32b8e@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <1bbbf0ca-4f32-ee62-5d49-b53a07e62055@intel.com> References: <20230616231341.2885622-1-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com> <20230616235651.58b9519c@kernel.org> <1bbbf0ca-4f32-ee62-5d49-b53a07e62055@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 12:13:06 -0700 Linga, Pavan Kumar wrote: > Thanks for the feedback. Given the timing and type of changes requested > for the patches, would it be possible to accept this patch series (v3) > in its current form, as we continue to develop and address all the > feedback in followup patches? I think you're asking to be accepted in a Linux-Staging kind of a way? AFAIK that's historically done for companies not very familiar with upstream development, and those completely disengaged where volunteers pick thru the rubble/code.