From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB95DE557; Thu, 22 Jun 2023 16:36:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D87F3C433C8; Thu, 22 Jun 2023 16:36:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1687451809; bh=pjzGP8R3SPlmAyHxL8Ci6L9a/VYrrsL3N2kb9NS++3k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=AH0Vg54iyLm1ss/adA4DhrQGdrGEfvYWoDA2wFK2DHDppXKNoysk5XoG2PlPoibAS sA69c3hiN0f2AyVBphkp7NSM3XWtVxEAuihcBh93+UYoAp+7f29WnKKBH0Mu1lpIJg spe3v1eZWxbNJntqvmykMb+PYDaHP9Fob+q2ZBtidnFfa0KtFO2SGQIM0uFy2/uAiA SebmjtnhWVXthwU5jaoo5ymrz3Lr4IzaFcLtrkx9BFD76PqHyfOeqAWmuyGebo0uiv MFILz2lMvgj7JyKyfHzM3rmaIUsKPYWk8QNwPLLSrNQKcukJCgeFdBcSMuAIyXIX5v s5Kk7+gRBS5Vg== Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 09:36:48 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Igor Russkikh , Arnd Bergmann Cc: Simon Horman , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Arnd Bergmann , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , Tom Rix , , , Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] net: atlantic: fix ring buffer alignment Message-ID: <20230622093648.3795e325@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <98b9dc2d-9232-d0e0-022e-2e8339b3cb66@marvell.com> References: <20230616092645.3384103-1-arnd@kernel.org> <20230620120038.0d9a261c@kernel.org> <98b9dc2d-9232-d0e0-022e-2e8339b3cb66@marvell.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 07:49:52 +0200 Igor Russkikh wrote: > > Agreed that the comment is confusing seems to be incorrect post-change. > > Flags for instance are overlapped with len, is_gso etc. so they can't be > > a separate 8B at the end. > > > > Igor, please advise how you want to proceed. > > I do agree better to remove the comment at all - it explains almost nothing. > > Thats not a hardware related structure, so explicit pack is for sure not required. > > Acked-by: Igor Russkikh Thanks Igor! Arnd, could you respin with the comment removed?