From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD4B4C2CB for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 15:34:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C36D6C433C8; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 15:34:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1687534484; bh=5F/1bOj9rfDgivkCjgiGDm4pRQrUOqnlQhxZnmM/tEE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=cg49VDk6Q/0V8Ky7B5OSjJut4pWQJc2k/BYq4Trm7CFPZl2+XUik/NuJd2+y1xPmy tFN/toiOo/Fz48wFP6zXHx0zKPYsfK9k4Sl8NQdXSPwMiNiobVR8+ZTxRRJk5qbYgI wqByPPhj5JQWpFcdzAG/PeBJjtxUyDO9jPVkvRIPinILjnSRFKSeplHDF5CcQhpVw0 Oyn3VJ8xQDUiKXVK3vSMOYqGtFx3jGwadzHO7yjmY6Rd5ZMcGsh9NyekbSSX29Qu7s PoEkWZd/smvNPEBemEpWsHMdIkQOBu1tN7dsHxUizSvA7aDGSkO2B0x96NB3uhcp86 /Rs5PIFczsJag== Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 08:34:42 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Christian Marangi Cc: Andrew Lunn , Florian Fainelli , Vladimir Oltean , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Pavel Machek , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH] net: dsa: qca8k: add support for additional modes for netdev trigger Message-ID: <20230623083442.02b17d69@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <64956c02.5d0a0220.ed611.6b79@mx.google.com> References: <20230621095409.25859-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com> <20230622193120.5cc09fc3@kernel.org> <64956c02.5d0a0220.ed611.6b79@mx.google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 05:10:47 +0200 Christian Marangi wrote: > > Something may be funny with the date on your system, FWIW, because your > > patches seem to arrive almost a day in the past. > > Lovely WSL istance (Windows Subsystem for Linux) that goes out of sync with > the host machine sometimes. Does the time cause any problem? I will > check that in the future before sending patches... Unfortunately for some reason patchwork orders patches by send time, not by the time the patches arrived, and we use a time-bound query to fetch new patches. So if the date is too far back the patches won't get fetched for the build tester.