From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55747FBE6 for ; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 22:28:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CF96C433C0; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 22:28:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1687645707; bh=Xr9seD7Mt0PFVk1QOrKGfmugFEuY6PJhYDOWIjAJ3WA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=FDUqIVyjZ3Cfh7ExAtZpIjceASv+BaEVlPCa8QEJ4bwPEW+jTqHQZEhfONR2MUwc3 5Mp0gKdkLj4yYQLd4HON2qkF41Gafrrox+E8wFnOW/o5l/4AJbOUNJWX33+EWfgGPg IMlt1eu3C19cBzoreFP44pgNG2aoeP1nlScOiTGit6W6FmW3c+wdZg8Z/Irg/2VY/z Va3h1a652baAJCbUVekzBE2STG4luQM/yDQ6HLorqhIp8fbo+xUhdkDX4AMjOZ5DwS gkOJ3WQc57aXgpkdEaF2BUlXnavrG1sH82rKexDKVDH4aTA6K8cg+7HxoqVa2B0Lza 4jV57LkHmGFlQ== Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2023 15:28:26 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Julia Lawall Cc: Veerasenareddy Burru , keescook@chromium.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Abhijit Ayarekar , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/26] octeon_ep: use array_size Message-ID: <20230624152826.10e3789b@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20230623211457.102544-3-Julia.Lawall@inria.fr> References: <20230623211457.102544-1-Julia.Lawall@inria.fr> <20230623211457.102544-3-Julia.Lawall@inria.fr> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 23:14:33 +0200 Julia Lawall wrote: > - oq->buff_info = vzalloc(oq->max_count * OCTEP_OQ_RECVBUF_SIZE); > + oq->buff_info = vzalloc(array_size(oq->max_count, OCTEP_OQ_RECVBUF_SIZE)); vcalloc seems to exist, is there a reason array_size() is preferred? -- pw-bot: cr