From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>,
Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@fb.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/4] net: page_pool: a couple assorted optimizations
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2023 17:01:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230701170155.6f72e4b8@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230629152305.905962-1-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
On Thu, 29 Jun 2023 17:23:01 +0200 Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> #3: new, prereq to #4. Add NAPI state flag, which would indicate
> napi->poll() is running right now, so that napi->list_owner would
> point to the CPU where it's being run, not just scheduled;
> #4: new. In addition to recycling skb PP pages directly when @napi_safe
> is set, check for the flag from #3, which will mean the same if
> ->list_owner is pointing to us. This allows to use direct recycling
> anytime we're inside a NAPI polling loop or GRO stuff going right
> after it, covering way more cases than is right now.
You know NAPI pretty well so I'm worried I'm missing something.
I don't think the new flag adds any value. NAPI does not have to
be running, you can drop patch 3 and use in_softirq() instead of
the new flag, AFAIU.
The reason I did not do that is that I wasn't sure if there is no
weird (netcons?) case where skb gets freed from an IRQ :(
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-02 0:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-29 15:23 [PATCH RFC net-next 0/4] net: page_pool: a couple assorted optimizations Alexander Lobakin
2023-06-29 15:23 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 1/4] net: skbuff: don't include <net/page_pool.h> to <linux/skbuff.h> Alexander Lobakin
2023-06-29 16:55 ` Alexander H Duyck
2023-06-30 12:39 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-06-30 15:11 ` Alexander Duyck
2023-06-30 16:05 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-06-29 15:23 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 2/4] net: page_pool: avoid calling no-op externals when possible Alexander Lobakin
2023-06-29 16:45 ` Alexander H Duyck
2023-06-30 12:29 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-06-30 14:44 ` Alexander Duyck
2023-06-30 15:34 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-06-30 18:28 ` Alexander Duyck
2023-07-03 13:38 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-07-03 20:32 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-05 14:41 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-06-29 15:23 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 3/4] net: add flag to indicate NAPI/GRO is running right now Alexander Lobakin
2023-06-29 15:23 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 4/4] net: skbuff: always recycle PP pages directly when inside a NAPI loop Alexander Lobakin
2023-07-02 0:01 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-07-03 13:50 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 0/4] net: page_pool: a couple assorted optimizations Alexander Lobakin
2023-07-03 18:57 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-05 12:31 ` Alexander Lobakin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230701170155.6f72e4b8@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=alexanderduyck@fb.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=larysa.zaremba@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).