From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
Cc: Yunsheng Lin <yunshenglin0825@gmail.com>,
Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<pabeni@redhat.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>,
Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
"Leon Romanovsky" <leon@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <hawk@kernel.org>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
<linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 RFC 1/6] page_pool: frag API support for 32-bit arch with 64-bit DMA
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 09:37:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230711093705.45454e41@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8639b838-8284-05a2-dbc3-7e4cb45f163a@intel.com>
On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 12:59:00 +0200 Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> I'm fine with that, although ain't really able to work on this myself
> now :s (BTW I almost finished Netlink bigints, just some more libie/IAVF
> crap).
FWIW I was thinking about the bigints recently, and from ynl
perspective I think we may want two flavors :( One which is at
most the length of platform's long long, and another which is
always a bigint. The latter will be more work for user space
to handle, so given 99% of use cases don't need more than 64b
we should make its life easier?
> It just needs to be carefully designed, because if we want move ALL the
> inlines to a new header, we may end up including 2 PP's headers in each
> file. That's why I'd prefer "core/driver" separation. Let's say skbuff.c
> doesn't need page_pool_create(), page_pool_alloc(), and so on, while
> drivers don't need some of its internal functions.
> OTOH after my patch it's included in only around 20-30 files on
> allmodconfig. That is literally nothing comparing to e.g. kernel.h
> (w/includes) :D
Well, once you have to rebuilding 100+ files it gets pretty hard to
clean things up ;)
I think I described the preferred setup, previously:
$path/page_pool.h:
#include <$path/page_pool/types.h>
#include <$path/page_pool/helpers.h>
$path/page_pool/types.h - has types
$path/page_pool/helpers.h - has all the inlines
C sources can include $path/page_pool.h, headers should generally only
include $path/page_pool/types.h.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-11 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-29 12:02 [PATCH v5 RFC 0/6] introduce page_pool_alloc() API Yunsheng Lin
2023-06-29 12:02 ` [PATCH v5 RFC 1/6] page_pool: frag API support for 32-bit arch with 64-bit DMA Yunsheng Lin
2023-07-07 23:59 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-09 12:39 ` Yunsheng Lin
2023-07-10 18:36 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-08 0:01 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-09 12:54 ` Yunsheng Lin
2023-07-10 18:38 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-11 10:59 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-07-11 16:37 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-07-11 16:59 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-07-11 20:09 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-12 12:34 ` Yunsheng Lin
2023-07-12 17:26 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-14 12:16 ` Yunsheng Lin
2023-07-14 13:44 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-07-14 17:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-17 12:33 ` Yunsheng Lin
2023-07-18 18:16 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-18 18:28 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-07-19 12:21 ` Yunsheng Lin
2023-06-29 12:02 ` [PATCH v5 RFC 2/6] page_pool: unify frag_count handling in page_pool_is_last_frag() Yunsheng Lin
2023-07-10 14:39 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-07-11 11:47 ` Yunsheng Lin
2023-06-29 12:02 ` [PATCH v5 RFC 3/6] page_pool: introduce page_pool[_cache]_alloc() API Yunsheng Lin
2023-06-29 12:02 ` [PATCH v5 RFC 4/6] page_pool: remove PP_FLAG_PAGE_FRAG flag Yunsheng Lin
2023-06-29 12:02 ` [PATCH v5 RFC 5/6] page_pool: update document about frag API Yunsheng Lin
2023-06-29 20:30 ` Randy Dunlap
2023-06-29 12:02 ` [PATCH v5 RFC 6/6] net: veth: use newly added page pool API for veth with xdp Yunsheng Lin
2023-06-29 14:26 ` [PATCH v5 RFC 0/6] introduce page_pool_alloc() API Alexander Lobakin
2023-06-30 11:57 ` Yunsheng Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230711093705.45454e41@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=liangchen.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=yunshenglin0825@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).