From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBD82168CE for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 17:11:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 03EECC433C8; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 17:11:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1689095462; bh=InfyI8SICKvF4zmJpauBWDNo/zPPdtTLtpODWeNYZJ4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=S32dMWGzpZI0vlWdhqWHPysllb8jt18+0TZ9/J6/kdL5p8gbnh9eiPh2pkxP+RwDr d0EN67ZYCRaVoqoGTdUn7tSaPbpFLOvIKB9W3RfO7Khnv/gc5uueJyhHejEN0QUEtp pIyQddscMT7tKiSD9x3pG9DciqYaTJHBdkJJC3KpKwgrjuvUf6W/QY5q9XxkZ/Pi6L 1gBsJQrRHm4KyQfkOzRIQfxTcHDyonHFTlhpw5HM9BDRs6j2HX+m+JAAOzoLO50WgT kTSiEJqjA5aP5GKAdjVoyApZESK4B7ir78UtN6hH91vgx3PoLSGiIsfyDB0tfShxUw r4Qhhl88+yrXQ== Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 20:10:58 +0300 From: Leon Romanovsky To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Paolo Abeni , Jakub Kicinski , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next][resend v1 1/1] netlink: Don't use int as bool in netlink_update_socket_mc() Message-ID: <20230711171058.GT41919@unreal> References: <20230710100624.87836-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20230711063348.GB41919@unreal> <2a2d55f167a06782eb9dfa6988ec96c2eedb7fba.camel@redhat.com> <20230711122012.GR41919@unreal> <20230711133259.GS41919@unreal> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 04:44:18PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 04:32:59PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 03:45:34PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 03:20:12PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 01:54:18PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 12:21:12PM +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 2023-07-11 at 09:33 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 01:06:24PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > ... > > > > > > > > So what is the outcome of "int - bool + bool" in the line above? > > > > > > > > > > The same as with int - int [0 .. 1] + int [0 .. 1]. > > > > > > > > No, it is not. bool is defined as _Bool C99 type, so strictly speaking > > > > you are mixing types int - _Bool + _Bool. > > > > > > 1. The original code already does that. You still haven't reacted on that. > > > > The original code was int - int + int. > > No. You missed the callers part. They are using boolean. I didn't miss and pointed you to the exact line which was implicitly changed with your patch. > > > > 2. Is what you are telling a problema? > > > > No, I'm saying that you took perfectly correct code which had all types > > aligned and changed it to have mixed type arithmetic. > > And after this change it's perfectly correct code with less letters and hidden > promotions (as a parameter to the function) and hence requires less cognitive > energy to parse. > > So, the bottom line is the commit message you don't like, is it so? Please reread my and Paolo replies. Thanks > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko > >