From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CE05639 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2023 03:34:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 562A3C433C7; Wed, 12 Jul 2023 03:34:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1689132871; bh=Bfdpy0REyIMivQ3MTx5pFL7twh+rSmHjMWaiG3EiDck=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=JY5zYbY6J/cBUFCX+XH84xowjs+97tPdzJCHDTB/gQuBaiBYj/GWgvv3A2LDvdigJ RHazPnBGBXuFbJQQv/47+Vfdts8rSL4L9PbMcfRAKMBFPRujzWuP9/u/EseZKNa8E4 1YdNFsQ6qVIrwwj9qSEDy36xRqTmgqo2sdq0EoUkFbPTPc5UrSmtLwL4EmacBKRSlG 0MX09OUoVeYrcGmf1PcPS6pzoE80P5VHP+pzKG501N43kA+K/+z1uR4GXO4M3wvKr3 d4wkWOWIqQSv4WPoILErfDqTC9PqMZVLrrWWa7jsK0TBmEf2Uwu4u8Bb+utOpiJAnW +unZmKr1UcmBw== Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 20:34:30 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Randy Dunlap Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Nikolay Aleksandrov Subject: Re: [PATCH net 07/12] inet: frags: remove kernel-doc comment marker Message-ID: <20230711203430.3c9e9ad2@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20230710230312.31197-8-rdunlap@infradead.org> References: <20230710230312.31197-1-rdunlap@infradead.org> <20230710230312.31197-8-rdunlap@infradead.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 16:03:07 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > -/** > +/* > * fragment queue flags Can we do: enum: fragment queue flags instead? This seems to get accepted by ./scripts/kernel-doc and it's nice to keep the "syntax" highlight of the comment, IMHO.