From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECD1C1FCF for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 05:19:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD5EFC433C7; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 05:19:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1689225580; bh=UORb9mc0lGDf75zSOdKYCgMV7oZNdLKIXMMWW6q0N5g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=j6g+cCZs+khGuIxRz84uliHvE461LQgBMfHoehprB45BRCFOqLRQ/Icmy2VmsAhZL Ckl8k9B6eUph1LLJCgh07g/gYX4e3/OqwK17L+iuCuCU7SkdKVpMhIC6ao17qVea+T Hv8CO//9N4HOKsI5feWg5cfFI5n9Y8/dG+q/w27h3CES8TUENYCpm7Tbi8jZoy2XKw 4EwWw+RhLGA4pYKNuXkMYZLKUm5u76b2HnhzsKJEQSdZq9DVFThBqLL7+ffKD61uqa K00MjFdCXYqoMKmnwE2xGBElrZ4cRPiDoIyfgAeCyO2ZI8Ay4g4/ZxmmC/ZMY0IyZP 1pk1dEFyRiV9Q== Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 22:19:38 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Suman Ghosh Cc: , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [net PATCH 1/3] octeontx2-af: Fix hash extraction mbox message Message-ID: <20230712221938.0ae4374e@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20230712111604.2290974-2-sumang@marvell.com> References: <20230712111604.2290974-1-sumang@marvell.com> <20230712111604.2290974-2-sumang@marvell.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 16:46:02 +0530 Suman Ghosh wrote: > As of today, hash extraction mbox message response supports only the > secret key. This patch adds support to extract both hash mask and hash > control along with the secret key. These are needed to use hash > reduction of 128 bit IPv6 address to 32 bit. What are hash mask and hash control? Why is this a fix and not a new feature / extension?