From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E20B7101C1 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 16:51:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC8F7C433C8; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 16:51:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1689267078; bh=W/DBBtggNPxcx48u53LFNXfUII6LqEjS3gR/CAjXJoM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=EGb2yZNBaWH+ToInoE+zVz4NcSNnvQ2sehjIbmSHQAZUY3d9Sc0DT5eWml7jxFe2r /fFVd5O1P/0LSHFMAiOqlNFvgnLhjrRfCzVvs9kwIZQu7y0WG67m0aVQVYbZhSmHk5 91K/zFbHLPshK9KvgGVvRHuX6k817Qj0G+iF6K4yRkYgyd3qFYYFc0iBXiCqzvcDbD gazRIW3SWfP54kzPnnW4Le2RAKt8kgcc3rFG5NJQUvUh3oRrl+lHAcVGeAYnd9TUgX 4Qr/Q5hOpCAYqrh5JlSA9iHJyAjbDmeMUAK5RIm7CvYlMH2kl+SCgYYDtD6cQfyNoz jR9ec/aQYg7ew== Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 09:51:16 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Paolo Abeni Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Dinh Nguyen , netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, joabreu@synopsys.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowskii+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: dwmac_socfpga: use the standard "ahb" reset Message-ID: <20230713095116.15760660@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <1061620f76bfe8158e7b8159672e7bb0c8dc75f2.camel@redhat.com> References: <20230710211313.567761-1-dinguyen@kernel.org> <20230710211313.567761-2-dinguyen@kernel.org> <20230712170840.3d66da6a@kernel.org> <1061620f76bfe8158e7b8159672e7bb0c8dc75f2.camel@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 14:39:57 +0200 Paolo Abeni wrote: > > However for ABI breaks with scope limited to only one given platform, it > > is the platform's maintainer choice to allow or not allow ABI breaks. > > What we, Devicetree maintainers expect, is to mention and provide > > rationale for the ABI break in the commit msg. > > @Dinh: you should at least update the commit message to provide such > rationale, or possibly even better, drop this 2nd patch on next > submission. Or support both bindings, because the reset looks optional. So maybe instead of deleting the use of "stmmaceth-ocp", only go down that path if stpriv->plat->stmmac_ahb_rst is NULL?